Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27607549›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of microbiology2016

Feedback Control of Two-Component Regulatory Systems.

Eduardo A Groisman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sodium ion stress accelerates cell lysis inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Redefining Antimicrobial Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Virulence regulation in the fish pathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eduardo A GroismanDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536; email: eduardo.groisman@yale.edu.

Funding

REGULATION OF SALMONELLA VIRULENCE BY THE PHOP PROTEINR01AI049561 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Eduardo Groisman · 2001 to 2026
$9.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-component systems are a dominant form of bacterial signal transduction. The prototypical two-component system consists of a sensor that responds to a specific input(s) by modifying the output of a cognate regulator. Because the output of a two-component system is the amount of phosphorylated regulator, feedback mechanisms may alter the amount of regulator, and/or modify the ability of a sensor or other proteins to alter the phosphorylation state of the regulator. Two-component systems may display intrinsic feedback whereby the amount of phosphorylated regulator changes under constant inducing conditions and without the participation of additional proteins. Feedback control allows a two-component system to achieve particular steady-state levels, to reach a given steady state with distinct dynamics, to express coregulated genes in a given order, and to activate a regulator to different extents, depending on the signal acting on the sensor.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacteriaBacterial ProteinsFeedback, PhysiologicalSignal TransductionBacterial Proteinsexpression dynamicsphosphorylationsignal accesstranscription surge

Identifiers

PMID27607549
PMCPMC8380452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.