ArticleJAMA oncology2017
Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk Following Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia on Needle Biopsy.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subsequent breast cancer risk after benign breast biopsy in racially diverse women: Siteman Cancer Center.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- The Complex Path from Mammary Ductal Hyperplasia to Breast Cancer: Elevated Malignancy Risk in Atypical Forms.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Implications of the COMET Trial for the Management of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Differential ER stress responses during lactation and postpartum outcomes in mice depending on their mitochondrial genotype.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cancer outcomes in women without upfront surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Observational
- Trends in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosis and Upgrade: A 20-Year Experience and Impact of MRI Use on Upgrade Rates.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Subsequent percutaneous breast biopsies after initial atypia diagnosis: The patient burden of long-term follow up.American journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Long term follow-up of women treated for screen detected atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular neoplasia in a large UK screening centre.BJC reports · 2024Article
- Participation in a High-Risk Program Is Associated with a Diagnosis of Earlier-Stage Disease Among Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer Development.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Recommendations for the Screening of Breast Cancer of the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Brazilian Society of Mastology and Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Association.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023Article
- Circulating microRNA Biomarker for Detecting Breast Cancer in High-Risk Benign Breast Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- T-type Ca2+ channels and their relationship with pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the human breast.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023Article
- Impact of Atypical Hyperplasia at Surgical Margins on breast cancer outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Atypical Hyperplasia Found Incidentally during Routine Breast Reduction Mammoplasty: Incidence and Management.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Breast cancer screening for women at high risk: review of current guidelines from leading specialty societies.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Review
- Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: Rationale, Present Practices, and Future Directions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Review
- Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia after Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Can We Reduce the Upgrade to Breast Cancer to an Acceptable Rate?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Risk factors for breast cancer development by tumor characteristics among women with benign breast disease.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2021Article
- The impact of mammographic screening on the subsequent breast cancer risk associated with biopsy-proven benign breast disease.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Deep Learning Image Analysis of Benign Breast Disease to Identify Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceAtypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a known risk factor for breast cancer. Published risk estimates are based on cohorts that included women whose ADH was diagnosed before widespread use of screening mammograms and did not differentiate between the methods used to diagnose ADH, which may be related to the size of the ADH focus. These risks may overestimate the risk in women with presently diagnosed ADH.
objectiveTo examine the risk of invasive cancer associated with ADH diagnosed using core needle biopsy vs excisional biopsy.
designA cohort study was conducted comparing the 10-year cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer in 955 331 women undergoing mammography with and without a diagnosis of ADH. Data were obtained from 5 breast imaging registries that participate in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. EXPOSURES: Diagnosis of ADH on core needle biopsy or excisional biopsy in women undergoing mammography. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten-year cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer.
resultsThe sample included 955 331 women with 1727 diagnoses of ADH, 1058 (61.3%) of which were diagnosed by core biopsy and 635 (36.8%) by excisional biopsy. The mean (interquartile range) age of the women at diagnosis was 52.6 (46.9-60.4) years. From 1996 to 2012, the proportion of ADH diagnosed by core needle biopsy increased from 21% to 77%. Ten years following a diagnosis of ADH, the cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.0-3.4) times higher than the risk in women with no ADH. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed via excisional biopsy was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.0 (95% CI, 2-4.5) and, via core needle biopsy, with an adjusted HR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.4). Ten years after an ADH diagnosis, an estimated 5.7% (95% CI, 4.3%-10.1%) of the women had a diagnosis of invasive cancer. Women with ADH diagnosed on excisional biopsy had a slightly higher risk (6.7%; 95% CI, 3.0%-12.8%) compared with those with ADH diagnosed via core needle biopsy (5%; 95% CI, 2.2%-8.9%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Current 10-year risks of invasive breast cancer after a diagnosis of ADH may be lower than those previously reported. The risk associated with ADH is slightly lower for women whose ADH was diagnosed by needle core biopsy compared with excisional biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.