Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27607340›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2016

Spectrum of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies and their treatments.

Iago Pinal-Fernandez, Andrew L Mammen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic management of immune-mediated necrotizing myositis.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A man with fever and bilateral limb weakness.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Clinical and pathological characteristics of immune mediated necrotizing myopathy].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iago Pinal-FernandezaNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda bJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Andrew L Mammen
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases · US

Funding

Muscle Disease UnitZIAAR041203 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI MAMMEN, ANDREW · 2015 to 2025
$19.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to describe the spectrum of clinical, histological, and serological features in patients with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNMs). RECENT

findingsAutoantibodies recognizing the signal recognition particle (SRP) or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) define two unique subtypes of necrotizing myositis patient with distinct clinical features. For example, the major histocompatibility class II human leukocyte antigen allele DRB111:01 is a strong immunogenetic risk factor for developing anti-HMGCR autoantibodies whereas B5001 and DQA10104 are over-represented in patients with anti-SRP autoantibodies. Furthermore, statin exposure is a risk factor only for anti-HMGCR autoantibodies. And while skeletal muscle involvement is predominant in most patients with both autoantibodies, lung involvement appears in ∼20% of anti-SRP-positive patients but is more rare in anti-HMGCR-positive patients. Of note, ∼20% of anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR positive patients have significant lymphocytic infiltrates on muscle biopsy and thus would not be formally categorized as having IMNM; aside from this, these patients are clinically indistinguishable from other patients with the same autoantibody profile. SUMMARY: Anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR autoantibodies define unique populations of IMNM patients. It may be more appropriate to subtype myositis patients based on these autoantibodies than on their muscle biopsy features.

Indexed as

Acyl Coenzyme AAutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesBiopsyHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHydroxymethylglutaryl CoA ReductasesMuscle, SkeletalMyositisNecrosisSignal Recognition Particle3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme AAcyl Coenzyme AAutoantibodiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHydroxymethylglutaryl CoA ReductasesSignal Recognition Particle

Identifiers

PMID27607340
PMCPMC11669099
OpenAlexW2514352608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.