Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27606900›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Do Hospitalized Premature Infants Benefit from Music Interventions? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Marianne J E van der Heijden, Sadaf Oliai Araghi, Johannes Jeekel, Irwin K M Reiss, M G Myriam Hunink, Monique van Dijk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04559620 (Mother Providing Recorded Voice to Her Preterm Infant in Incubator Improves Her Own Grief and Emotional Status), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04559620 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Mother Providing Recorded Voice to Her Preterm Infant in Incubator Improves Her Own Grief and Emotional Status

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2021 to 2024Enrolled67ConditionsMaternal Depressive Disorder Complicating Childbirth, Preterm Birth, Maternal Anxiety Disorder Complicating ChildbirthArmsMaternal voice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evaluating physiologic outcomes of music interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marianne J E van der HeijdenDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-5514
Sadaf Oliai AraghiDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes JeekelDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Neonatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M G Myriam HuninkDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Monique van DijkDepartment of Paediatrics, division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Intensive care Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeonatal intensive care units (NICU) around the world increasingly use music interventions. The most recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) dates from 2009. Since then, 15 new RCTs have been published. We provide an updated systematic review on the possible benefits of music interventions on premature infants' well-being.

methodsWe searched 13 electronic databases and 12 journals from their first available date until August 2016. Included were all RCTs published in English with at least 10 participants per group, including infants born prematurely and admitted to the NICU. Interventions were either recorded music interventions or live music therapy interventions. All control conditions were accepted as long as the effects of the music intervention could be analysed separately. A meta-analysis was not possible due to incompleteness and heterogeneity of the data.

resultsAfter removal of duplicates the searches retrieved 4893 citations, 20 of which fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The 20 included studies encompassed 1128 participants receiving recorded or live music interventions in the NICU between 24 and 40 weeks gestational age. Twenty-six different outcomes were reported which we classified into three categories: physiological parameters; growth and feeding; behavioural state, relaxation outcomes and pain. Live music interventions were shown to improve sleep in three out of the four studies and heart rate in two out of the four studies. Recorded music improved heart rate in two out of six studies. Better feeding and sucking outcomes were reported in one study using live music and in two studies using recorded music.

conclusionsAlthough music interventions show promising results in some studies, the variation in quality of the studies, age groups, outcome measures and timing of the interventions across the studies makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions on the effects of music in premature infants.

Indexed as

HospitalizationMusic TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBehaviorHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePain ManagementPublication BiasTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27606900
PMCPMC5015899
OpenAlexW2514494341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.