ArticleeLife2016
Problems on the back of an envelope.
Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetogenetics: remote activation of cellular functions triggered by magnetic switches.Nanoscale · 2022Review
- Extremely low frequency magnetic field induces human neuronal differentiation through NMDA receptor activation.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019Article
- Possible magneto-mechanical and magneto-thermal mechanisms of ion channel activation in magnetogenetics.eLife · 2019Article
- Magnetic Strategies for Nervous System Control.Annual review of neuroscience · 2019Review
- Magnetoferritin: Process, Prospects, and Their Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Magnetic Entropy as a Proposed Gating Mechanism for Magnetogenetic Ion Channels.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Temperature-activated ion channels in neural crest cells confer maternal fever-associated birth defects.Science signaling · 2017Article
- Programmed Self-Assembly of a Biochemical and Magnetic Scaffold to Trigger and Manipulate Microtubule Structures.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Claims that magnetic fields can be used to manipulate biological systems contradict some basic laws of physics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.