Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27606426›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Spatial Scaling of the Profile of Selective Attention in the Visual Field.

Matthew A Gannon, Ashley A Knapp, Thomas G Adams, Stephanie M Long, Nathan A Parks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew A GannonDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Ashley A KnappDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Thomas G AdamsDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Stephanie M LongDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Nathan A ParksDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.

Funding

Research Training in Functional Disability InterventionsT32MH062994 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MORRIS D. · 2002 to 2017
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH111037NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH062994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural mechanisms of selective attention must be capable of adapting to variation in the absolute size of an attended stimulus in the ever-changing visual environment. To date, little is known regarding how attentional selection interacts with fluctuations in the spatial expanse of an attended object. Here, we use event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the scaling of attentional enhancement and suppression across the visual field. We measured ERPs while participants performed a task at fixation that varied in its attentional demands (attentional load) and visual angle (1.0° or 2.5°). Observers were presented with a stream of task-relevant stimuli while foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral visual locations were probed by irrelevant distractor stimuli. We found two important effects in the N1 component of visual ERPs. First, N1 modulations to task-relevant stimuli indexed attentional selection of stimuli during the load task and further correlated with task performance. Second, with increased task size, attentional modulation of the N1 to distractor stimuli showed a differential pattern that was consistent with a scaling of attentional selection. Together, these results demonstrate that the size of an attended stimulus scales the profile of attentional selection across the visual field and provides insights into the attentional mechanisms associated with such spatial scaling.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionAttentionEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTask Performance and AnalysisVisual FieldsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27606426
PMCPMC5015866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.