ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutical investigation
Preparation and evaluation of a novel oral delivery system for low molecular weight heparin.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutical investigation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring peptide dendrimers for intestinal lymphatic targeting: formulation and evaluation of peptide dendrimer conjugated liposomes for enhancing the oral bioavailability of Asenapine maleate.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mechanistic engineering of celastrol liposomes induces ferroptosis and apoptosis by directly targeting VDAC2 in hepatocellular carcinoma.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the present work was to prepare and evaluate a novel oral formulation for systemic delivery of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The formulation consisted of Eudragit S 100-coated positively charged liposomes encapsulating LMWH and a penetration enhancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsPositively charged liposomes were first prepared by the thin film hydration method using lipid (soy phosphotidylcholine and cholesterol) and stearyl amine (SA) in the optimum ratio of 16:1, along with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) as a penetration enhancer. Prepared liposomes were coated with negatively charged Eudragit S 100 (0.3% w/v). The formulations were studied for various in vitro and in vivo properties. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) studies, and in vitro drug release were used for in vitro characterization of the formulations. Ex vivo permeation studies were performed by using distal small intestine of rat. Oral absorption studies were conducted with the rat model.
resultsCoating of the liposomes was confirmed by SEM and particle size determination studies. In vitro release studies of coated liposomes have demonstrated that the release of LMWH was in the following order: Stomach < small intestine < distal small intestine < colon. Ex vivo permeation studies have shown a fivefold increase in permeation of LMWH with Eudragit S 100-coated liposomes compared to uncoated, uncharged liposomes. Oral absorption studies have showed that with Eudragit-coated liposomes, the oral bioavailability of LMWH was improved, compared to plain LMWH solution. This is revealed by a threefold increase in the area under the curve (AUC) of the plasma concentration time curve.
conclusionA novel formulation for oral delivery of LMWH was thus successfully prepared and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.