ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2016
A Proposed Model for Selecting Measurement Procedures for the Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Before the Potty Party: Preparing Practitioners for Toilet Training.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Feasibility of Methods of Live Data Collection for Sociability Assessments.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Variation in Behavior Analysts' Treatment Intensity Recommendations for Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Barriers to Use of Experimental Analysis in Applied Behavior Analysis Clinical Practice.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- A Pilot Evaluation of Expert and Novice Use of the Functional Analysis Risk Assessment Decision Tool.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Assessing the Reliability of and Preference for an Ethical Decision Model.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- The Development of a Behavior Plan Quality Assurance Instrument in a Publicly Funded System of Care.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Next Steps in Use of the Eating Disorder Examination and Related Eating Disorder Assessments: A Call for Consensus.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Understanding and Reacting to Relapse: Considerations for Practitioners.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Review
- A Caregiver Survey on Medical and Behavior Analytic Treatments for Idiopathic Toe Walking.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- The Use of Technology and Telehealth to Improve Behavioral Sleep Assessment and Intervention.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- A Review of the Environmental Variables Included in Mand Training Interventions.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2024Review
- On the Use and Benefits of Electronic Data Collection Systems: A Tutorial on Countee.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Article
- Development and Preliminary Validation of the Patient Outcome Planning Calculator (POP-C): A Tool for Determining Treatment Dosage in Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Article
- When Cultural Awareness Reveals Conflicting Cultural Values: A Pragmatic Approach.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- cometrics: A New Software Tool for Behavior-analytic Clinicians and Machine Learning Researchers.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- The Effect of Schedule Thinning on Student Behavior During the Caught Being Good Game.Behavior modification · 2023Article
- Toward an Understanding of Data Collection Integrity.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Review
- Workplace Conflict in Applied Behavior Analysis: Prevalence, Impact, and Training.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Review
- A Controlled Evaluation of a Sport-Specific Performance Optimization Program in an Athlete Diagnosed With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder Within the Context of COVID-19.Clinical case studies · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Practicing behavior analysts frequently assess and treat problem behavior as part of their ongoing job responsibilities. Effective measurement of problem behavior is critical to success in these activities because some measures of problem behavior provide more accurate and complete information about the behavior than others. However, not every measurement procedure is appropriate for every problem behavior and therapeutic circumstance. We summarize the most commonly used measurement procedures, describe the contexts for which they are most appropriate, and propose a clinical decision-making model for selecting measurement produces given certain features of the behavior and constraints of the therapeutic environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.