ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2014
Ten Rules for Discussing Behavior Analysis.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical Resources for Embedding Opportunities to Practice Dissemination-Related Skills Into Coursework and Supervision Experiences.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Review
- School-Based Transdisciplinary Teaming to Maximize Behavioral Supports.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Review
- Why We All Need to Shape the Profession of Behavior Analysis through Advocacy and How to Get Started.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Introducing LADER: A Structured Approach to Effective Professional Interactions for Behavior Analysts.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- Measuring the Dissemination Impact of Culturo-Behavioral Science.Behavior and social issues · 2023Article
- When Rules Are Not Enough: Developing Principles to Guide Ethical Conduct.Behavior analysis in practice · 2021Review
- Autism, Insurance, and Discrimination: The Effect of an Autism Diagnosis on Behavior-Analytic Services.Behavior analysis in practice · 2020Article
- The Best and Worst Things Staff Report About Behavioral Training Workshops: a Large-Scale Evaluation.Behavior analysis in practice · 2019Article
- Pedagogy of Academic Narrative: Insights fromPerspectives on behavior science · 2018Article
- Editorial: Retrospections, Prospections and New Paths for Behavioral Science.The Behavior analyst · 2017Article
- Are Brazilian Behavior Analysts Publishing Outside the Box? A Survey of General Science Media.Behavior analysis in practice · 2017Article
- The Experts Have Spoken!: A Reply to Four Commentaries.Behavior analysis in practice · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mischaracterizations of behavior analysis are someone's behavior, and they should be approached in exactly the same way that behavior analysts approach behavior that is deemed curious, troubling, or self-injurious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.