Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27606184›Full record

ArticleThe Behavior analyst2016

Improving Public Perception of Behavior Analysis.

David H Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavior analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Video game engines as the new "virtual" Skinner box.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Teaching the History of Applied Behavior Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Humble Behaviorism Redux.Behavior and social issues · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Open Educational Resources in Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David H Freedman45 Rivard Road, Needham, MA 02492 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4065-9216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential impact of behavior analysis is limited by the public's dim awareness of the field. The mass media rarely cover behavior analysis, other than to echo inaccurate negative stereotypes about control and punishment. The media instead play up appealing but less-evidence-based approaches to problems, a key example being the touting of dubious diets over behavioral approaches to losing excess weight. These sorts of claims distort or skirt scientific evidence, undercutting the fidelity of behavior analysis to scientific rigor. Strategies for better connecting behavior analysis with the public might include reframing the field's techniques and principles in friendlier, more resonant form; pushing direct outcome comparisons between behavior analysis and its rivals in simple terms; and playing up the "warm and fuzzy" side of behavior analysis.

Indexed as

Behavior analysisMass mediaObesityOrganizational behavior managementPublic healthPublic perception

Identifiers

PMID27606184
PMCPMC4883502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.