ArticleThe Behavior analyst2016
Why Brains Are Not Computers, Why Behaviorism Is Not Satanism, and Why Dolphins Are Not Aquatic Apes.
Article in The Behavior analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Music Listening and Homeostatic Regulation: Surviving and Flourishing in a Sonic World.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- From Something Old to Something New: Functionalist Lessons for the Cognitive Science of Scientific Creativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.PloS one · 2021Article
- Cognition Without Neural Representation: Dynamics of a Complex System.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- On the "Strength" of Behavior.Perspectives on behavior science · 2020Article
- Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not "One Cognition".Journal of Intelligence · 2020Review
- Can Social Communication Skills for Children Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorder Rehearsed Inside the Video Game Environment of Minecraft Generalize to the Real World?JMIR serious games · 2020Article
- A Radical Reassessment of the Body in Social Cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Behavior Science Emerges.Perspectives on behavior science · 2018Article
- Factors Influencing Individual Variation in Farm Animal Cognition and How to Account for These Statistically.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018Review
- A New, Better BET: Rescuing and Revising Basic Emotion Theory.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- From Wide Cognition to Mechanisms: A Silent Revolution.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- A psychology of the human brain-gut-microbiome axis.Social and personality psychology compass · 2017Article
- Evolutionary Musicology Meets Embodied Cognition: Biocultural Coevolution and the Enactive Origins of Human Musicality.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern psychology has, to all intents and purposes, become synonymous with cognitive psychology, with an emphasis on the idea that the brain is a form of computer, whose job is to take in sensory input, process information, and produce motor output. This places the brain at a remove from both the body and environment and denies the intimate connection that exists between them. As a result, a great injustice is done to both human and nonhuman animals: On the one hand, we fail to recognize the distinctive nature of nonhuman cognition, and on the other hand, we continue to promote a somewhat misleading view of human psychological capacities. Here, I suggest a more mutualistic, embodied, enactive view might allow us to ask more interesting questions about how animals of all kinds come to know their worlds, in ways that avoid the (inevitable) anthropocentric baggage of the cognitivist viewpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.