Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27606065›Full record

ReviewRegeneration (Oxford, England)2016

Go ahead, grow a head! A planarian's guide to anterior regeneration.

Suthira Owlarn, Kerstin Bartscherer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The brain: a concept in flux.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suthira OwlarnMax Planck Research Group Stem Cells and Regeneration Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine Von-Esmarch-Str. 5448149 Münster Germany; Medical Faculty University of Münster Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 148149 Münster Germany; CiM-IMPRS Graduate School Schlossplatz 548149 Münster Germany.
Kerstin BartschererMax Planck Research Group Stem Cells and Regeneration Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine Von-Esmarch-Str. 5448149 Münster Germany; Medical Faculty University of Münster Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 148149 Münster Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique ability of some planarian species to regenerate a head de novo, including a functional brain, provides an experimentally accessible system in which to study the mechanisms underlying regeneration. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the key steps of planarian head regeneration (head-versus-tail decision, anterior pole formation and head patterning) and their molecular and cellular basis. Moreover, instructive properties of the anterior pole as a putative organizer and in coordinating anterior midline formation are discussed. Finally, we highlight that regeneration initiation occurs in a two-step manner and hypothesize that wound-induced and existing positional cues interact to detect tissue loss and together determine the appropriate regenerative outcomes.

Indexed as

OrganizerpatterningplanariapolarityregenerationWntwound

Identifiers

PMID27606065
PMCPMC5011478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.