Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27605610›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Reactivation of Rate Remapping in CA3.

C Daniela Schwindel, Zaneta Navratilova, Karim Ali, Masami Tatsuno, Bruce L McNaughton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C Daniela SchwindelUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.
Zaneta NavratilovaUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.
Karim AliUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.
Masami TatsunoUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.
Bruce L McNaughtonUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, and Neuroelectronic Research Flanders, 3000 Leuven, Belgium bruce.mcnaughton@uleth.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe hippocampus is thought to contribute to episodic memory by creating, storing, and reactivating patterns that are unique to each experience, including different experiences that happen at the same location. Hippocampus can combine spatial and contextual/episodic information using a dual coding scheme known as "global" and "rate" remapping. Global remapping selects which set of neurons can activate at a given location. Rate remapping readjusts the firing rates of this set depending on current experience, thus expressing experience-unique patterns at each location. But can the experience-unique component be retrieved spontaneously? Whereas reactivation of recent, spatially selective patterns in hippocampus is well established, it is never perfect, raising the issue of whether the experiential component might be absent. This question is key to the hypothesis that hippocampus can assist memory consolidation by reactivating and broadcasting experience-specific "index codes" to neocortex. In CA3, global remapping exhibits attractor-like dynamics, whereas rate remapping apparently does not, leading to the hypothesis that only the former can be retrieved associatively and casting doubt on the general consolidation hypothesis. Therefore, we studied whether the rate component is reactivated spontaneously during sleep. We conducted neural ensemble recordings from CA3 while rats ran on a circular track in different directions (in different sessions) and while they slept. It was shown previously that the two directions of running result in strong rate remapping. During sleep, the most recent rate distribution was reactivated preferentially. Therefore, CA3 can retrieve patterns spontaneously that are unique to both the location and the content of recent experience. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The hippocampus is required for memory of events and their spatial contexts. The primary correlate of hippocampal activity is location in space, but multiple memories can occur in the same location. To be useful for distinguishing these memories, the hippocampus must be able, not only to express, but also to retrieve both spatial and nonspatial information about events. Whether it can retrieve nonspatial information has been challenged recently. We exposed rats to two different experiences (running in different directions) in the same locations and showed that even the nonspatial components of hippocampal cell firing are reactivated spontaneously during sleep, supporting the conclusion that both types of information about a recent experience can be retrieved.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAction PotentialsAnimalsCA3 Region, HippocampalElectroencephalographyMaleMaze LearningMemoryNerve NetNeuronsRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, WistarStatistics as TopicTime FactorsCA3episodic memoryhippocampusmemory reactivationrate remapping

Identifiers

PMID27605610
PMCPMC6601871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.