Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27605603›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Resolving Behavioral Output via Chemogenetic Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs.

C Joseph Burnett, Michael J Krashes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Editorial:Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Activity of Insula to Basolateral Amygdala Projecting Neurons is Necessary and Sufficient for Taste Valence Representation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Wiring the depressed brain: optogenetic and chemogenetic circuit interrogation in animal models of depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Joseph BurnettDiabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, and Brown University-National Institutes of Health Graduate Partnerships Program, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.
Michael J KrashesDiabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, and michael.krashes@nih.gov.

Funding

Probing neural circuits underlying satietyZIADK075087 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI KRASHES, MICHAEL J. · 2013 to 2025
$4.7M
Unraveling hippocampal networks related to food memoriesZIADK075089 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI KRASHES, MICHAEL J. · 2013 to 2025
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS ZIA DK075087NIDDK NIH HHS ZIA DK075089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) have proven to be highly effective neuromodulatory tools for the investigation of neural circuits underlying behavioral outputs. They exhibit a number of advantages: they rely on cell-specific manipulations through canonical intracellular signaling pathways, they are easy and cost-effective to implement in a laboratory setting, and they are easily scalable for single-region or full-brain manipulations. On the other hand, DREADDs rely on ligand-G-protein-coupled receptor interactions, leading to coarse temporal dynamics. In this review we will provide a brief overview of DREADDs, their implementation, and the advantages and disadvantages of their use in animal systems. We also will provide numerous examples of their use across a broad variety of biomedical research fields.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsBehaviorBrainDesigner DrugsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeuronsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionDesigner DrugsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledbehaviorcell-type specificitychemogeneticsDREADD

Identifiers

PMID27605603
PMCPMC5013180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.