Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27605377›Full record

ArticleOpen biology2016

Dynamics of cell wall elasticity pattern shapes the cell during yeast mating morphogenesis.

Björn Goldenbogen, Wolfgang Giese, Marie Hemmen, Jannis Uhlendorf, Andreas Herrmann, Edda Klipp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Analysis of Cell Wall Mechanics in Fission Yeast.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bending stiffness ofLab on a chip · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Membrane bending by actin polymerization.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Björn GoldenbogenTheoretical Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang GieseTheoretical Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Marie HemmenTheoretical Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Jannis UhlendorfTheoretical Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HerrmannMolecular Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Edda KlippTheoretical Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany edda.klipp@biologie.hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0567-7075
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell wall defines cell shape and maintains integrity of fungi and plants. When exposed to mating pheromone, Saccharomyces cerevisiae grows a mating projection and alters in morphology from spherical to shmoo form. Although structural and compositional alterations of the cell wall accompany shape transitions, their impact on cell wall elasticity is unknown. In a combined theoretical and experimental approach using finite-element modelling and atomic force microscopy (AFM), we investigated the influence of spatially and temporally varying material properties on mating morphogenesis. Time-resolved elasticity maps of shmooing yeast acquired with AFM in vivo revealed distinct patterns, with soft material at the emerging mating projection and stiff material at the tip. The observed cell wall softening in the protrusion region is necessary for the formation of the characteristic shmoo shape, and results in wider and longer mating projections. The approach is generally applicable to tip-growing fungi and plants cells.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisCell ShapeCell WallElasticityFinite Element AnalysisKineticsMating FactorMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, BiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeMating Factoratomic force microscopycell wall elasticityfinite-element modellingSaccharomyces cerevisiaetip growthturgor pressure

Identifiers

PMID27605377
PMCPMC5043577
OpenAlexW2508179613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.