Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27605205›Full record

ReviewNature structural & molecular biology2016

The pol II CTD: new twists in the tail.

Justyna Zaborowska, Sylvain Egloff, Shona Murphy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting CDKs in the RNAPII transcription cycle.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dual Modes of Gene Regulation by CDK12.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. iScience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Justyna ZaborowskaSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sylvain EgloffLaboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Shona MurphySir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400653Medical Research Council MR/M010716/1Wellcome Trust WT106134A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit of RNA polymerase (pol) II comprises conserved heptad repeats, and post-translational modification of the CTD regulates transcription and cotranscriptional RNA processing. Recently, the spatial patterns of modification of the CTD repeats have been investigated, and new functions of CTD modification have been revealed. In addition, there are new insights into the roles of the enzymes that decorate the CTD. We review these new findings and reassess the role of the pol II CTD in the regulation of gene expression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationProtein DomainsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalTranscription, GeneticAnimalsConsensus SequenceCyclin-Dependent Kinase 9DNA Polymerase IIHumansPhosphorylationProtein SubunitsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 9DNA Polymerase IIProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID27605205
OpenAlexW2516935932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.