Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27605169›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2016

Critical review on the mechanisms of maturation stress generation in trees.

Tancrède Alméras, Bruno Clair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Force Generation in the Coiling Tendrils of Passiflora caerulea.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Wood and the Activity of Dead Tissue.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Flax (Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Is the G-Layer a Tertiary Cell Wall?Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tancrède AlmérasLaboratoire de Mécanique et Génie Civil (LMGC), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, cc 048, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France tancrede.almeras@umontpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2843-5466
Bruno ClairCNRS, UMR Ecologie des Forêts de Guyane (EcoFoG), AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRA, Université des Antilles, Université de Guyane, 97310 Kourou, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trees control their posture by generating asymmetric mechanical stress around the periphery of the trunk or branches. This stress is produced in wood during the maturation of the cell wall. When the need for reaction is high, it is accompanied by strong changes in cell organization and composition called reaction wood, namely compression wood in gymnosperms and tension wood in angiosperms. The process by which stress is generated in the cell wall during its formation is not yet known, and various hypothetical mechanisms have been proposed in the literature. Here we aim at discriminating between these models. First, we summarize current knowledge about reaction wood structure, state and behaviour relevant to the understanding of maturation stress generation. Then, the mechanisms proposed in the literature are listed and discussed in order to identify which can be rejected based on their inconsistency with current knowledge at the frontier between plant science and mechanical engineering.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalCell WallCycadopsidaMagnoliopsidaTreesWoodG-layermaturation stressmicromechanicsreaction woodtension woodtree biomechanics

Identifiers

PMID27605169
PMCPMC5046956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.