Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27604856›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2018

Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds?

Eran Pichersky, Robert A Raguso

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 291 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
291citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

291 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Terpenoids fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plant-Endophyte Cross-Talk inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

231 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eran PicherskyDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Michigan, MI, 48109, USA.
Robert A RagusoDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation of the USA DEB-1342792National Science Foundation of the USA IOS-1025636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All plants synthesize a suite of several hundred terpenoid compounds with roles that include phytohormones, protein modification reagents, anti-oxidants, and more. Different plant lineages also synthesize hundreds of distinct terpenoids, with the total number of such specialized plant terpenoids estimated in the scores of thousands. Phylogenetically restricted terpenoids are implicated in defense or in the attraction of beneficial organisms. A popular hypothesis is that the ability of plants to synthesize new compounds arose incrementally by selection when, as a result of gradual changes in their biotic partners and enemies, the 'old' plant compounds were no longer effective, a process dubbed the 'coevolutionary arms race'. Another hypothesis posits that often the sheer diversity of such compounds provides benefits that a single compound cannot. In this article, we review the unique features of the biosynthetic apparatus of terpenes in plants that facilitate the production of large numbers of distinct terpenoids in each species and how facile genetic and biochemical changes can lead to the further diversification of terpenoids. We then discuss evidence relating to the hypotheses that given ecological functions may be enhanced by the presence of mixtures of terpenes and that the acquisition of new functions by terpenoids may favor their retention once the original functions are lost.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansPhylogenyPlantsSymbiosisTerpenesTerpenesbiochemistryevolutionplant defensesecondary metabolismspecialized metabolitesterpenes

Identifiers

PMID27604856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.