ArticlePhysiological reports2016
Space-time codependence of retinal ganglion cells can be explained by novel and separable components of their receptive fields.
Article in Physiological reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial Adaptation of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells Between Artificial and Natural Stimuli.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Gaussian Process Inference Reveals Non-separability of Position and Velocity Tuning in Grid Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Modulation of narrow-field amacrine cells on light-evoked spike responses and receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.Vision research · 2023Article
- Increased Reliability of Visually-Evoked Activity in Area V1 of the MECP2-Duplication Mouse Model of Autism.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Abnormal perception of pattern-induced flicker colors in subjects with glaucoma.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Nonlinear Spatial Integration Underlies the Diversity of Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Natural Images.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Single transient intraocular pressure elevations cause prolonged retinal ganglion cell dysfunction and retinal capillary abnormalities in mice.Experimental eye research · 2020Article
- Intraocular Pressure Elevation Compromises Retinal Ganglion Cell Light Adaptation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Glycinergic and GABAergic interneurons shift the location and differentially alter the size of ganglion cell receptive field centers in the mammalian retina.Vision research · 2020Article
- Article
- Genetic dissection of rod and cone pathways mediating light responses and receptive fields of ganglion cells in the mouse retina.Vision research · 2020Article
- Mild Intraocular Pressure Elevation in Mice Reveals Distinct Retinal Ganglion Cell Functional Thresholds and Pressure-Dependent Properties.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Pathway-Specific Asymmetries between ON and OFF Visual Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Elevated IOP alters the space-time profiles in the center and surround of both ON and OFF RGCs in mouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Space-time codependence of retinal ganglion cells can be explained by novel and separable components of their receptive fields.Physiological reports · 2016Article
- The ON Crossover Circuitry Shapes Spatiotemporal Profile in the Center and Surround of Mouse OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reverse correlation methods such as spike-triggered averaging consistently identify the spatial center in the linear receptive fields (RFs) of retinal ganglion cells (GCs). However, the spatial antagonistic surround observed in classical experiments has proven more elusive. Tests for the antagonistic surround have heretofore relied on models that make questionable simplifying assumptions such as space-time separability and radial homogeneity/symmetry. We circumvented these, along with other common assumptions, and observed a linear antagonistic surround in 754 of 805 mouse GCs. By characterizing the RF's space-time structure, we found the overall linear RF's inseparability could be accounted for both by tuning differences between the center and surround and differences within the surround. Finally, we applied this approach to characterize spatial asymmetry in the RF surround. These results shed new light on the spatiotemporal organization of GC linear RFs and highlight a major contributor to its inseparability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.