ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2017
Oscillometric assessment of arterial stiffness in everyday clinical practice.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical activity level and influencing factors in pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome patients: A case-control study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment: A Useful Tool to Screen Asymptomatic Individuals at High Cardiovascular Risk?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Vascular Health of Females with History of Assisted Reproductive Technology.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Association between estimation of pulse wave velocity and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: an analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness Parameters Measurement With Noninvasive Methods-A Systematic Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2024Review
- Low muscle strength and increased arterial stiffness go hand in hand.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Accuracy of Pulse Wave Velocity Predicting Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Would Oscillometry be Able to Solve the Dilemma of Blood Pressure Independent Pulse Wave Velocity - A Novel Approach Based on Long-Term Pulse Wave Analysis?Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Frequency of early vascular aging and associated risk factors among an adult population in Latin America: the OPTIMO study.Journal of human hypertension · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is considered the gold standard for assessing arterial stiffness. Although widely used in clinical and observational studies, the detection of cfPWV has not yet been applied in everyday clinical practice due to technical and procedural difficulties. We, therefore, evaluated the applicability of oscillometric cfPWV assessment for everyday clinical practice. Eighty-nine patients were prospectively included in the study. Oscillometric calculations of cfPWV were performed with Tel-O-GRAPH and tonometric calculations with Sphygmocor. The accuracy, reproducibility, reliability and robustness of Tel-O-GRAPH calculations in different clinical situations were evalu??ated. The mean study population age was 48.8±19.1 years. More than half (59.6%) of the patients were male, and 15.1% were smokers. The mean difference of PWV between devices was 0.49±1.26 m s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.