Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27603264›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2016

Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Daniel Fogerty, Jayne B Ahlstrom, William J Bologna, Judy R Dubno

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel FogertyUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia.
Jayne B AhlstromMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
William J BolognaMedical University of South Carolina, CharlestonUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Judy R DubnoMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
AUDITORY ANALYSIS AND SPEECH RECOGNITIONR01DC000184 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2016
$5.1M
Maximizing Speech Recognition Under Adverse Listening ConditionsR03DC012506 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FOGERTY, DANIEL · 2012 to 2014
$313k
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000184NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC012506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated how listeners process acoustic cues preserved during sentences interrupted by nonsimultaneous noise that was amplitude modulated by a competing talker. Method: Younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with normal or impaired hearing listened to sentences with consonants or vowels replaced with noise amplitude modulated by a competing talker. Sentences were spectrally shaped according to individual audiograms or to the mean audiogram from the listeners with hearing impairment for a younger spectrally shaped control group. The modulation spectrum of the noise was low-pass filtered at different modulation cutoff frequencies. The effect of noise level was also examined. Results: Performance declined when nonsimultaneous masker modulation included faster rates and was maximized when masker modulation matched the preserved primary speech modulation. Vowels resulted in better performance compared with consonants at slower modulation cutoff rates, likely due to suprasegmental features. Poorer overall performance was observed with increased age or hearing loss, and for listeners who received spectrally shaped speech. Conclusions: Nonsimultaneous amplitude modulations from a competing talker significantly interacted with the preserved speech segment, and additional listener factors were observed for age and hearing loss. Importantly, listeners may obtain benefit from nonsimultaneous competing modulations when they match the preserved modulations of the sentence.

Indexed as

NoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAnalysis of VarianceHearing LossHearing TestsHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27603264
PMCPMC5345559
OpenAlexW2516132610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.