ArticlePeerJ2016
Systematic relationships of five newly sequenced cervid species.
Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- ZooKeys · 2025Article
- Draft genome of the endangered visayan spotted deer (GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Article
- Comparative studies of X chromosomes in Cervidae family.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Revalidation ofZooKeys · 2023Article
- Ruminant inner ear shape records 35 million years of neutral evolution.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Phylogeny and evolution of the genus Cervus (Cervidae, Mammalia) as revealed by complete mitochondrial genomes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Molecular mechanisms and topological consequences of drastic chromosomal rearrangements of muntjac deer.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Revalidation ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- A new viewpoint on antlers reveals the evolutionary history of deer (Cervidae, Mammalia).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Molecular identification of Mazama species (Cervidae: Artiodactyla) from natural history collections.Genetics and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Genome-wide study on genetic diversity and phylogeny of five species in the genus Cervus.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Complete mitochondrial genome of northern Indian red muntjac (Muntiacus vaginalis) and its phylogenetic analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Bony labyrinth morphology clarifies the origin and evolution of deer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervid phylogenetics has been puzzling researchers for over 150 years. In recent decades, molecular systematics has provided new input for both the support and revision of the previous results from comparative anatomy but has led to only partial consensus. Despite all of the efforts to reach taxon-wide species sampling over the last two decades, a number of cervid species still lack molecular data because they are difficult to access in the wild. By extracting ancient DNA from museum specimens, in this study, we obtained partial mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences for Mazama bricenii, Mazama chunyi, Muntiacus atherodes, Pudu mephistophiles, and Rusa marianna, including three holotypes. These new sequences were used to enrich the existing mitochondrial DNA alignments and yielded the most taxonomically complete data set for cervids to date. Phylogenetic analyses provide new insights into the evolutionary history of these five species. However, systematic uncertainties within Muntiacus persist and resolving phylogenetic relationships within Pudu and Mazama remain challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.