ArticleAdvances in wound care2016
Article in Advances in wound care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescents with facial burns.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Electric Factors in Wound Healing.Advances in wound care · 2021Article
- In vivo volumetric monitoring of revascularization of traumatized skin using extended depth-of-field photoacoustic microscopy.Frontiers of optoelectronics · 2020Article
- Automatic skin lesion area determination of basal cell carcinoma using optical coherence tomography angiography and a skeletonization approach: Preliminary results.Journal of biophotonics · 2019Article
- Optical coherence tomography based angiography [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2017Review
- Optical coherence tomography based microangiography provides an ability to longitudinally image arteriogenesis in vivo.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2016Article
- Depth-resolved 3D visualization of coronary microvasculature with optical microangiography.Physics in medicine and biology · 2016Article
- Assessment of edema volume in skin upon injury in a mouse ear model with optical coherence tomography.Lasers in medical science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.