Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27602203›Full record

ReviewCell & bioscience2016

A new paradigm of DNA synthesis: three-metal-ion catalysis.

Wei Yang, Peter J Weng, Yang Gao

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell & bioscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A wide survey of heavy metals-inducedCurrent research in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Visualizing the three-metal-ion-dependent cleavage of a mutagenic nucleotide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Role of Natural Polymorphic Variants of DNA Polymerase β in DNA Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei YangLaboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3591-2195
Peter J WengLaboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
Yang GaoLaboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme catalysis has been studied for over a century. How it actually occurs has not been visualized until recently. By combining in crystallo reaction and X-ray diffraction analysis of reaction intermediates, we have obtained unprecedented atomic details of the DNA synthesis process. Contrary to the established theory that enzyme-substrate complexes and transition states have identical atomic composition and catalysis occurs by the two-metal-ion mechanism, we have discovered that an additional divalent cation has to be captured en route to product formation. Unlike the canonical two metal ions, which are coordinated by DNA polymerases, this third metal ion is free of enzyme coordination. Its location between the α- and β-phosphates of dNTP suggests that the third metal ion may drive the phosphoryltransfer from the leaving group opposite to the 3'-OH nucleophile. Experimental data indicate that binding of the third metal ion may be the rate-limiting step in DNA synthesis and the free energy associated with the metal-ion binding can overcome the activation barrier to the DNA synthesis reaction.

Identifiers

PMID27602203
PMCPMC5012070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.