Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27602151›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2016

Evaluation of EGFR as a prognostic and diagnostic marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Hana Polanska, Martina Raudenska, Kristyna Hudcová, Jaromir Gumulec, Marketa Svobodova, Zbynek Heger, Michaela Fojtu, Hana Binkova, Zuzana Horakova, Rom Kostrica and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dose predictions for [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hana PolanskaCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Martina RaudenskaCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Kristyna HudcováCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jaromir GumulecCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Marketa SvobodovaCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Zbynek HegerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Michaela FojtuCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Hana BinkovaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, CZ-656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.
Zuzana HorakovaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, CZ-656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.
Rom KostricaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, CZ-656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.
Vojtech AdamCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Rene KizekCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Michal MasarikCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 90% of all head and neck tumors are squamous cell carcinomas. The overall survival of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is low (≤50%). A non-invasive marker of disease progression is sorely required. The present study focused on the plasmatic levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in HNSCC patients (N=92) compared with healthy (N=29) and diabetic [type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); N=26] controls. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using antibodies against the extracellular region of EGFR (L25-S645) was performed. No significant changes were observed between diabetic and healthy controls. However, there were significantly higher EGFR plasma levels in HNSCC patients compared with both control groups (P=0.001 and 0.005, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a sensitivity of 76.09%, a specificity of 67.27% and an area under curve of 0.727 for this comparison. No significant association was observed between EGFR plasma levels and tumor stage, tumor grade, lymph node or distant metastasis occurrence, smoking habit or hypertension. However, the presence of human papillomavirus infection and T2DM in HNSCC patients had borderline effect on the plasma EGFR levels. Survival analysis revealed no significant influence of plasmatic EGFR levels on the overall and disease-specific survival of HNSCC patients. In conclusion, EGFR plasma levels appear to be a relatively promising diagnostic, but poor prognostic, HNSCC marker.

Indexed as

biomarkerdiagnosisEGFRhead and neck tumorsplasmaspinocellular cancer

Identifiers

PMID27602151
PMCPMC4998659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.