Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27602049›Full record

ArticleImmunity & ageing : I & A2016

Booster vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria: insufficient protection against diphtheria in young and elderly adults.

Marco Grasse, Andreas Meryk, Michael Schirmer, Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein, Birgit Weinberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity & ageing : I & A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Influence of immune aging on vaccine responses.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020
    Review
  12. Vaccination Coverage of the Elderly in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco GrasseInstitute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, Rennweg 10, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Andreas MerykInstitute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, Rennweg 10, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael SchirmerDepartment of Internal Medicine VI, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Beatrix Grubeck-LoebensteinInstitute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, Rennweg 10, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Birgit WeinbergerInstitute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, Rennweg 10, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-946X
Universität Innsbruck · ATInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently demonstrated that single shot vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria do not lead to long-lasting immunity against diphtheria in elderly persons despite administration at 5 year intervals. In the present study we have immunized a group of young adults against tetanus and diphtheria to compare the pre- and 28 days post-vaccination immune responses in the young group with results of the same vaccination performed in an elderly group of a previous study. We also studied protection in both groups 5 years after vaccination. We compared antibody titers at all three time points and also analyzed the T cell responses in both age groups 5 years after vaccination. Before vaccination 9 % of the elderly persons were not protected against tetanus, and 48 % did not have protection against diphtheria. In the young group all participants were protected against tetanus, but 52 % were also unprotected against diphtheria before vaccination. 28 days after vaccination 100 % of all participants had protective antibody concentrations against tetanus and only a small percentage in each age group (<10 %) was unprotected against diphtheria. 5 years later, 100 % of both cohorts were still protected against tetanus, but 24 % of the young and 54 % of the elderly group were unprotected against diphtheria. Antibody concentrations against diphtheria measured by ELISA correlated well with their neutralizing capacity. T cell responses to tetanus and diphtheria did not differ between young and old persons. We conclude that booster vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria according to present recommendations provide long-lasting protection only against tetanus, but not against diphtheria, independently of age. In elderly persons, the level of protection is even lower, probably due to intrinsic age-related changes within the immune system and/or insufficient vaccination earlier in life.

Indexed as

AdultsBooster vaccinationDiphtheriaElderlyTetanus

Identifiers

PMID27602049
PMCPMC5011835
OpenAlexW2513868392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.