Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27601231›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2016

Disease-specific pain and function predict future pain impact in hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Lisa C Carlesso, Gillian A Hawker, Esther J Waugh, Aileen M Davis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa C CarlessoÉcole de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada. lisa.carlesso@umontreal.ca.
Gillian A HawkerDepartment of Medicine and Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 190 Elizabeth St., RFE, 3-805, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Esther J WaughDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto; Women's College Hospital, c/o Dept of Medicine, Rm 3467,76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Aileen M DavisDepartment of Physical Therapy and Institute of Rehabilitation Science and Institute of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
American Physical Therapy Association · USToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine if osteoarthritis (OA) pain and function, persistent low back pain (LBP) and psychosocial factors predict future pain impact (PI) in people with hip and knee OA. In a population-based cohort with hip/knee OA, a standardized telephone questionnaire was used to assess baseline sociodemographics, baseline PI, patient-reported OA severity (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) summary score), psychosocial factors (fatigue, pain catastrophizing (PC), anxiety, social network, and depression), and self-reported persistent LBP. Two years post-baseline, PI was assessed using the Pain Impact Questionnaire. The association of key independent variables with PI was evaluated through multivariable linear regression, adjusting for covariates (e.g., age, sex, baseline PI, etc.) In 462 participants, the mean age was 76 years (range 58 to 96), 78 % were female and 35 % reported LBP at baseline. Mean scores for PC (9.4), and anxiety (3.7) were low and social network (20.1) high. In multivariable regression analyses, only the WOMAC summary score (unstandardized ß 0.181 95% CI (0.12, 0.24) p < 0.001) was independently associated with greater PI at follow-up. In a population-based cohort with hip/knee OA, only the baseline WOMAC summary score was an independent predictor of future PI. This suggests that treatment needs to be focused on limiting pain severity and functional limitations in individuals with hip and knee OA. However, scores for the psychosocial factors are indicative of a healthy cohort and therefore results may not be generalizable to those with poorer psychosocial health.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesDepressionFatigueFemaleHumansKnee JointLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOntarioOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeKnee osteoarthritisLow back painPsychosocialWOMAC

Identifiers

PMID27601231
OpenAlexW2518868905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.