Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27601051›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2016

Cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with recurrent prostate cancer who underwent salvage extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Daniar K Osmonov, Alexey V Aksenov, David Trick, Carsten M Naumann, Moritz F Hamann, Amr Abou Faddan, Klaus-Peter Jünemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of salvage lymph node dissection in patients previously treated for prostate cancer: systematic review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Salvage lymph node dissection for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-identified oligometastatic disease.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pre-treatmentEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2018
    Article
  16. [Surgery for metastatic prostate cancer].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniar K OsmonovDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Alexey V AksenovDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany. Alexey.Aksenov@uksh.de.
David TrickDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Carsten M NaumannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Moritz F HamannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Amr Abou FaddanDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Klaus-Peter JünemannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 18, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence who underwent salvage extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), taking into consideration pre- and postoperative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

methodsSalvage ePLND was performed in a cohort of 54 patients with PCa recurrence, and data from 45 patients were analyzed. The indications for salvage ePLND were biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PCa and suspect findings on (11)C-choline PET/CT. PSA-level, biochemical response (BR), duration of biochemical recurrence freedom (BCRF), number of metastases, OS and CSS were analyzed retrospectively.

resultsThe average follow-up was 42.7 ± 20.8 months. Thirty-three patients (73.3 %, 95 % CI: 60.5-83.6 %) achieved BCRF during follow-up. The mean BCRF-period was 31.4 ± 19.7 months. CSS and OS were both 91.7 % ± 4.8 % (3-year survival) and 80.6 ± 8.6 % (5-year survival). Twenty-four patients (53.3 %, 95 % CI: 40.0-66.3 %) with castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) responded again to ADT after salvage ePLND.

conclusionsSalvage ePLND for selected patients with BCR and clinically recurrent nodal disease can achieve an immediate complete PSA response (i. e. BCRF) in nearly half of the patients. Patients with CRPC responded again to ADT after ePLND. Multicenter prospective studies with a control group are needed.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionSalvage TherapyAgedHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBiochemical relapseCancer-specific survivalLymph node dissectionRecurrent prostate cancerSalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID27601051
PMCPMC5012041
OpenAlexW2509573955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.