Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27601035›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016

Abdominal wall integrity after open abdomen: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

A Willms, S Schaaf, R Schwab, I Richardsen, D Bieler, B Wagner, C Güsgen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mesh-augmented versus direct abdominal closure in patients undergoing open abdomen treatment.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A WillmsDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Rübenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany. arnulfwillms@gmx.de.
S SchaafDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Rübenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
R SchwabDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Rübenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
I RichardsenDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Rübenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
D BielerDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Hand Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
B WagnerDirectorate-General for Strategy and Operations, Federal Ministry of Defence, Berlin, Germany.
C GüsgenDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Rübenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
BundeswehrBundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEFederal Ministry of Defence · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe open abdomen has become a standard technique in the management of critically ill patients undergoing surgery for severe intra-abdominal conditions. Negative pressure and mesh-mediated fascial traction are commonly used and achieve low fistula rates and high fascial closure rates. In this study, long-term results of a standardised treatment approach are presented.

methodsFifty-five patients who underwent OA management for different indications at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were enrolled. All patients were treated under a standardised algorithm that uses a combination of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Structured follow-up assessments were offered to patients and included a medical history, a clinical examination and abdominal ultrasonography. The data obtained were statistically analysed.

resultsThe fascial closure rate was 74 % in an intention-to-treat analysis and 89 % in a per-protocol analysis. The fistula rate was 1.8 %. Thirty-four patients attended follow-up. The median follow-up was 46 months (range 12-88 months). Incisional hernias developed in 35 %. Patients with hernias needed more operative procedures (10.3 vs 3.4, p = 0.03) than patients without hernia formation. A Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) of 31.1 was calculated. Patients with symptomatic hernias (NAS of 2-10) had a significantly lower mean POSAS score (p = 0.04).

conclusionsVacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) seem to result in low complication rates and high fascial closure rates. Abdominal wall reconstruction, which is a challenging and complex procedure and causes considerable patient discomfort, can thus be avoided in the majority of cases. Available results are based on studies involving only a small number of cases. Multi-centre studies and registry-based data are therefore needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapySurgical MeshAbdominal WallAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCritical IllnessFasciaFemaleHumansLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesIncisional herniaNegative pressure therapyOpen abdomenOutcomePeritonitisPrimary delayed fascial closure

Identifiers

PMID27601035
OpenAlexW2520853532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.