Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600633›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement reduces risk of infections in primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

A Schiavone Panni, K Corona, M Giulianelli, G Mazzitelli, C Del Regno, M Vasso

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The application of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in preventing periprosthetic joint infection: an umbrella review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does antibiotic bone cement reduce infection rates in primary total knee arthroplasty?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Schiavone PanniDepartment of Medicine and Science for Health, University of Molise, via Francesco De Sanctis, Campobasso, Italy.
K CoronaDepartment of Medicine and Science for Health, University of Molise, via Francesco De Sanctis, Campobasso, Italy. katia.corona@unimol.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-8361
M GiulianelliDepartment of Medicine and Science for Health, University of Molise, via Francesco De Sanctis, Campobasso, Italy.
G MazzitelliDepartment of Medicine and Science for Health, University of Molise, via Francesco De Sanctis, Campobasso, Italy.
C Del RegnoDepartment of Medicine and Science for Health, University of Molise, via Francesco De Sanctis, Campobasso, Italy.
M VassoDepartment of Medicine and Science for Health, University of Molise, via Francesco De Sanctis, Campobasso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAntibiotic-loaded bone cement has been widely used for the treatment of infected knee replacement, but its routine use in primary TKA remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the literature about the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for its prophylactic use in primary TKA.

methodsA detailed and systematic search of the Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews and Google Scholar databases had been performed using the keyword "total knee arthroplasty" "total knee replacement" "total knee prosthesis" and "antibiotic-loaded bone cement" with no limit regarding the year of publication. We used modified Coleman scoring methodology (mCMS) to identify scientifically sound articles in a reproducible format. The review was limited to the English-language articles.

resultsSix articles met inclusion criteria. In total, 6318 arthroplasties were included in our study. 3217 of these arthroplasties received antibiotic-loaded bone cement and 3101 arthroplasties served as the control. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the incidence of deep or superficial surgical site infection. The average mCMS score was 67.6, indicating good methodological quality in the included studies.

conclusionsPresent review did not reveal any significant difference in terms of rate of deep or superficial surgical site infection in patients receiving antibiotic-loaded bone cement compared with the control (plain bone cement) during primary TKA. The clinical relevance of this study was that the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement did not significantly reduce the risk of infection in primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone CementsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansKnee ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsAntibiotic-loaded bone cementInfectionPlain bone cementTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.