Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600520›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017

The utility of patient-reported outcome measures among patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

Kyle W Murdock, Xin Shelley Wang, Qiuling Shi, Charles S Cleeland, Christopher P Fagundes, Suzanne D Vernon

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Detoxification Intervention for Gulf War Illness: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyle W MurdockDepartment of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Xin Shelley WangDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1450, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. xswang@mdanderson.org.
Qiuling ShiDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1450, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Charles S CleelandDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1450, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Christopher P FagundesDepartment of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Suzanne D VernonBateman Horne Center of Excellence, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project Heart: Biobehavioral Effects on Cardiovascular Risk for Bereaved SpousesR01HL127260 · NHLBI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI FAGUNDES, CHRISTOPHER PAUL · 2015 to 2019
$4.1M
The Brain-Heart Connection: How Inhibition Relates to Cardiovascular DiseaseF32HL131353 · NHLBI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MURDOCK, KYLE W · 2016 to 2017
$60k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL131353NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDebilitating fatigue is a core symptom of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS); however, the utility of patient-reported symptom outcome measures of fatigue for ME/CFS patients is problematic due to ceiling effects and issues with reliability and validity. We sought to evaluate the performance of three patient-reported symptom measures in a sample of ME/CFS patients and matched controls.

methodsTwo hundred and forty ME/CFS patients and 88 age, sex, race, and zip code matched controls participated in the study. Participants completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, and RAND SF-36.

resultsThe general and physical fatigue subscales on Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, as well as the role of physical health on the RAND SF-36, demonstrated questionable or unacceptable internal consistency and problematic ceiling effects. The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire demonstrated excellent internal reliability, and less than 5 % of participants were at the ceiling on each subscale. The post-exertional malaise subscale on the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire demonstrated excellent clinical utility as it was able to differentiate between ME/CFS patients and controls (OR 1.23, p < .001) and predicted ceiling effects on other patient-reported outcome subscales. A score of 20 on the post-exertional malaise subscale of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire optimally differentiated between patients and controls.

conclusionsSignificant ceiling effects and concerns with reliability and validity were observed among Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 and RAND SF-36 subscales for ME/CFS patients. The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire addresses a number of concerns typically identified when using patient-reported outcome measures with ME/CFS patients; however, an improved multidimensional patient-reported outcome tool for measuring ME/CFS-related symptoms is warranted.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentAdultAgedData Interpretation, StatisticalFatigue Syndrome, ChronicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportYoung AdultChronic fatigue syndromeFatigueMyalgic encephalomyelitisSensitivitySymptom measurement

Identifiers

PMID27600520
PMCPMC5336422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.