Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600412›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2017

R Loops and Links to Human Disease.

Patricia Richard, James L Manley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Protein-mediated stabilization and nicking of the nontemplate DNA strand dramatically affect R-loop formation in vitro.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transcription-Coupled Repair and R-Loop Crosstalk in Genome Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia RichardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: pr2232@columbia.edu.
James L ManleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Funding

Regulation of RNA processing: Mechanisms and ConsequencesR35GM118136 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI James L. Manley · 2016 to 2026
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant R-loop structures are increasingly being realized as an important contributor to human disease. R loops, which are mainly co-transcriptional, abundant RNA/DNA hybrids, form naturally and can indeed be beneficial for transcription regulation at certain loci. However, their unwanted persistence elsewhere or in particular situations can lead to DNA double-strand breaks, chromosome rearrangements, and hypermutation, which are all sources of genomic instability. Mutations in genes involved in R-loop resolution or mutations leading to R-loop formation at specific genes affect the normal physiology of the cell. We discuss here the examples of diseases for which a link with R loops has been described, as well as how disease-causing mutations might participate in the development and/or progression of diseases that include repeat-associated conditions, other neurological disorders, and cancers.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenomic InstabilityNucleic Acid ConformationTranscription, GeneticDiseaseGene Expression RegulationHumanschromatin reorganizationgenomic instabilityhuman diseasesR loopstranscription

Identifiers

PMID27600412
PMCPMC5478472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.