ReviewGlobalization and health2016
Mapping of research on maternal health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a review of 2292 publications between 2000 and 2012.
Review in Globalization and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Characteristics of longitudinal maternal health studies in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic mapping of literature between 2012 and 2022.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of heat exposure impacts on maternal, fetal and neonatal health.Nature medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014-2016.BMJ global health · 2019Pooled it
- The global burden, risk and inequality of maternal obstructed labor and uterine rupture from 1990 to 2019.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Non-communicable diseases and maternal health: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Randomised trials in maternal and perinatal health in low and middle-income countries from 2010 to 2019: a systematic scoping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Developmental origins of disease highlight the immediate need for expanded access to comprehensive prenatal care.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Mega-map of systematic reviews and evidence and gap maps on the interventions to improve child well-being in low- and middle-income countries.Campbell systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Health Care Workers' Perspectives of the Influences of Disrespectful Maternity Care in Rural Kenya.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Prenatal stress and child development: A scoping review of research in low- and middle-income countries.PloS one · 2018Article
- Patterns of authorship on community health workers in low-and-middle-income countries: an analysis of publications (2012-2016).BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Maternal mortality in Mexico, beyond millennial development objectives: An age-period-cohort model.PloS one · 2018Article
- Maternal health research outputs and gaps in Latin America: reflections from the mapping study.Globalization and health · 2017Article
- Understanding the implementation of maternity waiting homes in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative thematic synthesis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProgress in achieving maternal health goals and the rates of reductions in deaths from individual conditions have varied over time and across countries. Assessing whether research priorities in maternal health align with the main causes of mortality, and those factors responsible for inequitable health outcomes, such as health system performance, may help direct future research. The study thus investigated whether the research done in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) matched the principal causes of maternal deaths in these settings.
methodsSystematic mapping was done of maternal health interventional research in LMICs from 2000 to 2012. Articles were included on health systems strengthening, health promotion; and on five tracer conditions (haemorrhage, hypertension, malaria, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs)). Following review of 35,078 titles and abstracts in duplicate, data were extracted from 2292 full-text publications.
resultsOver time, the number of publications rose several-fold, especially in 2004-2007, and the range of methods used broadened considerably. More than half the studies were done in sub-Saharan Africa (55.4 %), mostly addressing HIV and malaria. This region had low numbers of publications per hypertension and haemorrhage deaths, though South Asia had even fewer. The proportion of studies set in East Asia Pacific dropped steadily over the period, and in Latin America from 2008 to 2012. By 2008-2012, 39.1 % of articles included health systems components and 30.2 % health promotion. Only 5.4 % of studies assessed maternal STI interventions, diminishing with time. More than a third of haemorrhage research included health systems or health promotion components, double that of HIV research.
conclusionSeveral mismatches were noted between research publications, and the burden and causes of maternal deaths. This is especially true for South Asia; haemorrhage and hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa; and for STIs worldwide. The large rise in research outputs and range of methods employed indicates a major expansion in the number of researchers and their skills. This bodes well for maternal health if variations in research priorities across settings and topics are corrected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.