Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600316›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2016

Patient Navigators and Parent Use of Quality Data: A Randomized Trial.

Sarah L Goff, Kathleen M Mazor, Penelope S Pekow, Katharine O White, Aruna Priya, Tara Lagu, Haley Guhn-Knight, Lorna Murphy, Yara Youssef Budway, Peter K Lindenauer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of EHR-Based Pediatric Quality Measures: Views of Health System Leaders and Parents.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah L GoffThe Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts; sarah.goffmd@baystatehealth.org.
Kathleen M MazorMeyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Penelope S PekowThe Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Katharine O WhiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aruna PriyaThe Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Tara LaguThe Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Haley Guhn-KnightThe Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Lorna MurphyRenal Transplant Associates of New England, Springfield, Massachusetts; and.
Yara Youssef BudwayMassachusetts General Hospital, Physician Analytics and Business Intelligence, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter K LindenauerThe Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts.

Funding

IDEAS for a Healthy Baby: Reducing Disparities in Consumer Use of Quality DataR21HS021864 · AHRQ · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI GOFF, SARAH L · 2012 to 2014
$922k
Defining Optimal Clinical Strategies for Critically Ill Heart Failure PatientsK01HL114745 · NHLBI · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI LAGU, TARA C · 2013 to 2017
$721k
Identifying Factors Associated With High Quality Pediatric Primary CareK23HD080870 · NICHD · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI GOFF, SARAH L · 2015 to 2018
$534k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS021864NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL114745NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD080870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumers rarely use publicly reported health care quality data. Despite known barriers to use, few studies have explored the effectiveness of strategies to overcome barriers in vulnerable populations.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial tested the impact of a patient navigator intervention to increase consumer use of publicly reported quality data. Patients attending an urban prenatal clinic serving a vulnerable population enrolled between May 2013 and January 2015. The intervention consisted of 2 in-person sessions in which women learned about quality performance and viewed scores for local practices on the Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Web site. Women in both the intervention and control arms received a pamphlet about health care quality. Primary study outcomes were mean clinical quality and patient experience scores of the practices women selected (range 1-4 stars).

resultsNearly all (726/746; 97.3%) women completed the study, 59.7% were Hispanic, and 65.1% had a high school education or less. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, women in the intervention group chose practices with modestly higher mean clinical quality (3.2 vs 3.0 stars; P = .001) and patient experience (3.0 vs 2.9 stars; P = .05) scores. When asked to rate what factors mattered the most in their decision, few cited quality scores.

conclusionsAn intervention to reduce barriers to using publicly reported health care quality data had a modest effect on patient choice. These findings suggest that factors other than performance on common publicly reported quality metrics have a stronger influence on which pediatric practices women choose.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPatient NavigationQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansInternetMassachusettsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareSingle-Blind MethodVulnerable PopulationsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27600316
PMCPMC5051210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.