Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600213›Full record

ReviewMicroarrays (Basel, Switzerland)2015

3D Cultivation Techniques for Primary Human Hepatocytes.

Anastasia Bachmann, Matthias Moll, Eric Gottwald, Cordula Nies, Roman Zantl, Helga Wagner, Britta Burkhardt, Juan J Martínez Sánchez, Ruth Ladurner, Wolfgang Thasler and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anastasia BachmannBG Trauma Center, Siegfried Weller Institut, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tü̈bingen, Germany. anastasia.bachmann@gmail.com.
Matthias MollBG Trauma Center, Siegfried Weller Institut, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tü̈bingen, Germany. matthias.moll@student.uni-tuebingen.de.
Eric GottwaldInstitute for Biological Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, POB 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany. eric.gottwald@kit.edu.
Cordula NiesInstitute for Biological Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, POB 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany. cordula.nies@kit.edu.
Roman ZantlGmbH, Am Klopferspitz 19, 82152 Martinsried, Germany. rzantl@ibidi.de.
Helga WagnerGmbH, Am Klopferspitz 19, 82152 Martinsried, Germany. hwagner@ibidi.de.
Britta BurkhardtBG Trauma Center, Siegfried Weller Institut, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tü̈bingen, Germany. britta.burkhardt@gmx.de.
Juan J Martínez SánchezBG Trauma Center, Siegfried Weller Institut, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tü̈bingen, Germany. jjmartinezsanchez@live.com.
Ruth LadurnerClinic for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. ruth.ladurner@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Wolfgang ThaslerDepartment of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich Hospital Grosshadern, 81377 Munich, Germany. wolfgang.thasler@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Georg DammDepartment for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Charité Medical University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. georg.damm@charite.de.
Andreas K NusslerBG Trauma Center, Siegfried Weller Institut, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tü̈bingen, Germany. andreas.nuessler@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main challenges in drug development is the prediction of in vivo toxicity based on in vitro data. The standard cultivation system for primary human hepatocytes is based on monolayer cultures, even if it is known that these conditions result in a loss of hepatocyte morphology and of liver-specific functions, such as drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. As it has been demonstrated that hepatocytes embedded between two sheets of collagen maintain their function, various hydrogels and scaffolds for the 3D cultivation of hepatocytes have been developed. To further improve or maintain hepatic functions, 3D cultivation has been combined with perfusion. In this manuscript, we discuss the benefits and drawbacks of different 3D microfluidic devices. For most systems that are currently available, the main issues are the requirement of large cell numbers, the low throughput, and expensive equipment, which render these devices unattractive for research and the drug-developing industry. A higher acceptance of these devices could be achieved by their simplification and their compatibility with high-throughput, as both aspects are of major importance for a user-friendly device.

Indexed as

drug-induced hepatotoxicityhydrogelsin vitro modellong-term cultureprimary human hepatocytesscaffoldsthree-dimensional (3D) cell culturetwo-dimensional (2D) cell culture

Identifiers

PMID27600213
PMCPMC4996383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.