Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600077›Full record

ReviewMicroarrays (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Living Cell Microarrays: An Overview of Concepts.

Rebecca Jonczyk, Tracy Kurth, Antonina Lavrentieva, Johanna-Gabriela Walter, Thomas Scheper, Frank Stahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Drop impact printing.Nature communications · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Respiratory Tularemia:The open microbiology journal · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca JonczykInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Callinstr. 5, Hannover 30167, Germany. rjonczyk@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Tracy KurthInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Callinstr. 5, Hannover 30167, Germany. kurth@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Antonina LavrentievaInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Callinstr. 5, Hannover 30167, Germany. lavrentieva@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Johanna-Gabriela WalterInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Callinstr. 5, Hannover 30167, Germany. walter@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Thomas ScheperInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Callinstr. 5, Hannover 30167, Germany. scheper@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Frank StahlInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Callinstr. 5, Hannover 30167, Germany. stahl@iftc.uni-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living cell microarrays are a highly efficient cellular screening system. Due to the low number of cells required per spot, cell microarrays enable the use of primary and stem cells and provide resolution close to the single-cell level. Apart from a variety of conventional static designs, microfluidic microarray systems have also been established. An alternative format is a microarray consisting of three-dimensional cell constructs ranging from cell spheroids to cells encapsulated in hydrogel. These systems provide an in vivo-like microenvironment and are preferably used for the investigation of cellular physiology, cytotoxicity, and drug screening. Thus, many different high-tech microarray platforms are currently available. Disadvantages of many systems include their high cost, the requirement of specialized equipment for their manufacture, and the poor comparability of results between different platforms. In this article, we provide an overview of static, microfluidic, and 3D cell microarrays. In addition, we describe a simple method for the printing of living cell microarrays on modified microscope glass slides using standard DNA microarray equipment available in most laboratories. Applications in research and diagnostics are discussed, e.g., the selective and sensitive detection of biomarkers. Finally, we highlight current limitations and the future prospects of living cell microarrays.

Indexed as

3D cell constructsaffinity-based arrayscell attachment and stimulationliving cell microarrays (LCMAs)microfluidic devicesorgan-on-a-chip (OOC)transfected cell microarrays

Identifiers

PMID27600077
PMCPMC5003487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.