Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27599927›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2016

Epidemiological survey of enteric viruses in wild boars in the Czech Republic: First evidence of close relationship between wild boar and human rotavirus A strains.

Romana Moutelíková, Lucie Dufková, Jiří Kamler, Jakub Drimaj, Radim Plhal, Jana Prodělalová

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romana MoutelíkováDepartment of Virology, Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: moutelikova@vri.cz.
Lucie DufkováDepartment of Virology, Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dufkoval@vri.cz.
Jiří KamlerDepartment of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jiri.kamler@gmail.com.
Jakub DrimajDepartment of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: j.drimaj@seznam.cz.
Radim PlhalDepartment of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: radim.plhal@mendelu.cz.
Jana ProdělalováDepartment of Virology, Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 62100 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: prodelalova@vri.cz.
Mendel University in Brno · CZVeterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population of wild boar is increasing in the whole Europe, the animals migrate close to human habitats which greatly increases the possibility of natural transmission between domestic animals or humans and wild boars. The aim of the study was to estimate in population of free-living wild boar in the Czech Republic the prevalence of enteric viral pathogens, namely rotavirus groups A and C (RVA and RVC), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and members of family Coronaviridae (transmissible gastroenteritis virus - TGEV, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus - PEDV, porcine respiratory coronavirus - PRCV, and porcine hemagglutination encephalomyelitis virus - PHEV) and Picornaviridae,(teschovirus A - PTV, sapelovirus A - PSV, and enterovirus G - EV-G). In our study, stool samples from 203 wild boars culled during hunting season 2014-2015 (from October to January) were examined by RT-PCR. RVA was detected in 2.5% of tested samples. Nucleotide analysis of VP7, VP4, and VP6 genes revealed that four RVA strains belong to G4P[25]I1, G4P[6]I5, G11P[13]I5, and G5P[13]I5 genotypes and phylogenetic analysis suggested close relation to porcine and human RVAs. The prevalence of RVC in wild boar population reached 12.8%, PTV was detected in 20.2%, PSV in 8.9%, and EV-G in 2.5% of samples. During our study no PRRSV or coronaviruses were detected. Our study provides the first evidence of RVC prevalence in wild boars and indicates that wild boars might contribute to the genetic variability of RVA and also serve as an important reservoir of other enteric viruses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsCoronaviridaeCoronaviridae InfectionsCzech RepublicDisease ReservoirsFecesFemaleGenotypeHumansMalePhylogenyPicornaviridaePicornaviridae InfectionsRotavirusAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsVP4 protein, RotavirusVP6 protein, RotavirusVP7 protein, RotavirusEnteric virusesPhylogenyRotavirus ART-PCRWild boar

Identifiers

PMID27599927
PMCPMC7117292
OpenAlexW2499878888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.