Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27599814›Full record

SynthesisThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2016

Natriuretic peptides and integrated risk assessment for cardiovascular disease: an individual-participant-data meta-analysis.

Natriuretic Peptides Studies Collaboration, Peter Willeit, Stephen Kaptoge, Paul Welsh, Adam Butterworth, Rajiv Chowdhury, Sarah Spackman, Lisa Pennells, Pei Gao, Stephen Burgess and 47 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

57 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Natriuretic Peptides Studies Collaboration
Peter Willeit
Stephen Kaptoge
Paul Welsh
Adam Butterworth
Rajiv Chowdhury
Sarah Spackman
Lisa Pennells
Pei Gao
Stephen Burgess
Daniel Freitag
Michael Sweeting
Angela Wood
Nancy Cook
Suzanne Judd
Stella Trompet
Vijay Nambi
Michael Olsen
Brendan Everett
Frank Kee
Johan Ärnlöv
Veikko Salomaa
Daniel Levy
Jussi Kauhanen
Jari Laukkanen
Maryam Kavousi
Toshiharu Ninomiya
Juan-Pablo Casas
Lori Daniels
Lars Lind
Caroline Kistorp
Jens Rosenberg
Thomas Mueller
Speranza Rubattu
Demosthenes Panagiotakos
Oscar Franco
James de Lemos
Andreas Luchner
Jorge Kizer
Stefan Kiechl
Jukka Salonen
S Goya Wannamethee
Rudolf de Boer
Børge Nordestgaard
Jonas Andersson
Torben Jørgensen
Olle Melander
Christie Ballantyne
Christopher DeFilippi
Paul Ridker
Mary Cushman
Wayne Rosamond
Simon Thompson
Vilmundur Gudnason
Naveed Sattar
John Danesh
Emanuele Di Angelantonio
National Institute for Health Research · GBThe Coordinating Center · USMedical Research Council · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3679British Heart Foundation FS/10/37/28413British Heart Foundation FS/12/62/29889British Heart Foundation PG/13/66/30442British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067British Heart Foundation RG/13/13/30194British Heart Foundation SP/09/002Medical Research Council G0800270Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/7Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases focus on prediction of coronary heart disease and stroke. We assessed whether or not measurement of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration could enable a more integrated approach than at present by predicting heart failure and enhancing coronary heart disease and stroke risk assessment.

methodsIn this individual-participant-data meta-analysis, we generated and harmonised individual-participant data from relevant prospective studies via both de-novo NT-proBNP concentration measurement of stored samples and collection of data from studies identified through a systematic search of the literature (PubMed, Scientific Citation Index Expanded, and Embase) for articles published up to Sept 4, 2014, using search terms related to natriuretic peptide family members and the primary outcomes, with no language restrictions. We calculated risk ratios and measures of risk discrimination and reclassification across predicted 10 year risk categories (ie, <5%, 5% to <7·5%, and ≥7·5%), adding assessment of NT-proBNP concentration to that of conventional risk factors (ie, age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes, and total and HDL cholesterol concentrations). Primary outcomes were the combination of coronary heart disease and stroke, and the combination of coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure.

findingsWe recorded 5500 coronary heart disease, 4002 stroke, and 2212 heart failure outcomes among 95 617 participants without a history of cardiovascular disease in 40 prospective studies. Risk ratios (for a comparison of the top third vs bottom third of NT-proBNP concentrations, adjusted for conventional risk factors) were 1·76 (95% CI 1·56-1·98) for the combination of coronary heart disease and stroke and 2·00 (1·77-2·26) for the combination of coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Addition of information about NT-proBNP concentration to a model containing conventional risk factors was associated with a C-index increase of 0·012 (0·010-0·014) and a net reclassification improvement of 0·027 (0·019-0·036) for the combination of coronary heart disease and stroke and a C-index increase of 0·019 (0·016-0·022) and a net reclassification improvement of 0·028 (0·019-0·038) for the combination of coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure.

interpretationIn people without baseline cardiovascular disease, NT-proBNP concentration assessment strongly predicted first-onset heart failure and augmented coronary heart disease and stroke prediction, suggesting that NT-proBNP concentration assessment could be used to integrate heart failure into cardiovascular disease primary prevention.

fundingBritish Heart Foundation, Austrian Science Fund, UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, European Research Council, and European Commission Framework Programme 7.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

PMID27599814
PMCPMC5035346
OpenAlexW2556674574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.