Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27599711›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Is brain angio-MRI useful in infective endocarditis management?

J Champey, P Pavese, H Bouvaist, M Maillet, A Kastler, B Boussat, P Francois, and the investigator groups

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Host-Bacterium Interaction Mechanisms inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Role of Cerebral Imaging on Diagnosis and Management in Patients With Suspected Infective Endocarditis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J ChampeyIntensive Care Medicine, CHU de Grenoble, BP 218, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France. JChampey@chu-grenoble.fr.
P PaveseInfectious Disease Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
H BouvaistCardiology Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
M MailletInfectious Disease Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
A KastlerNeuroradiology Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
B BoussatPublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
P FrancoisPublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
and the investigator groups
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In infective endocarditis (IE), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful to diagnose clinically silent neurological events. We assessed the usefulness of systematic early brain MRI in IE diagnosis and medico-surgical management. Over a period of 1 year, all patients admitted in one of the three hospitals participating in and fulfilling the Duke criteria for definite or possible IE underwent cerebral MRI within 7 days of IE suspicion. Eight panels of experts analyzed the records a posteriori. For each case, one record with and one record without the MRI results were randomly assigned to two panels, which determined the theoretical diagnosis and treatment. Paired comparisons were performed using a symmetry test. Thirty-seven brain MRIs were performed within a median of 5 days after inclusion. MRI was pathological in 26 patients (70 %), showing 62 % microischemia and 58 % microbleeds. The expert advice did not differ significantly between the two evaluations (with or without the MRI results). The therapeutic strategies determined diverged in five cases (13.5 %). Diagnosis differed in two cases (5.4 %), with an upgrading of diagnosis from possible to definite IE using MRI results. Early brain MRI did not significantly affect the IE diagnosis and medico-surgical treatment plan. These results suggest that systematic use of early brain MRI is irrelevant in IE. Further studies are necessary to define whether MRI is mandatory in IE management within a multidisciplinary approach, with particular attention paid to better timing and the subset of patients in whom this imaging examination could be beneficial.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain DiseasesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEndocarditisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27599711
OpenAlexW2510340945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.