Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27599567›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2016

Uterine perforation following a fractional curettage successfully treated with the modified polysaccharide 4DryField® PH: a case report.

Nicole Ziegler, Matthias Korell, Anja Herrmann, Maya Sophie de Wilde, Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche, Angelika Larbig, Rudy Leon De Wilde

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of the effect ofHealth science reports · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole ZieglerClinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital-Medical Campus University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Matthias KorellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johanna-Etienne-Hospital, Neuss, Germany.
Anja HerrmannClinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital-Medical Campus University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Maya Sophie de WildeClinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital-Medical Campus University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Luz Angela Torres-de la RocheClinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital-Medical Campus University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Angelika LarbigClinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital-Medical Campus University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Rudy Leon De WildeClinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital-Medical Campus University, Oldenburg, Germany. rudy-leon.dewilde@pius-hospital.de.
Pius Hospital Oldenburg · DEJohanna-Etienne-Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine perforation is the most common complication of curettage and may result in bleeding. Therefore, urgent control of bleeding from the uterine wall perforation is necessary to avoid an emergency hysterectomy or blood transfusion, to prevent peritoneal adhesion formation, possible chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. In the present case, an active bleeding secondary to a perforation of the uterus during curettage, for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma, was instantaneously and successfully treated with only the application of a novel modified polysaccharide powder. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first time that the agent 4DryField® has been used for this purpose. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old German woman with serometra and endometrial hyperplasia suffered a perforation of the anterior wall of the uterus during the hysteroscopic resection of submucosal polyps and a fractional curettage. Subsequently, an immediate laparoscopy showed an active bleeding from the wound, which was promptly stopped with only the application of the hemostatic and anti-adhesion polysaccharide powder, 4DryField®. There were no postoperative complications. Nine weeks later, a laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy for endometrial carcinoma (histology: stage IA, pT1a, cN0, L0 V0 M0/G2) was performed. The former injured area looked slightly prominent, was completely healed, and showed a shiny serosa. All her pelvic organs were free of adhesions, and there was one 0.5-mm calcified granuloma in the Douglas pouch.

conclusionsThe efficient hemostasis combined with the adhesion prevention effect of 4DryField®, allowed a fast control of the uterine wall bleeding, saved operation time, avoided the risks of other procedures for bleeding control and contributed to the normal healing of the uterine wall without any adhesion formation.

Indexed as

AgedCurettageFemaleHemostasisHemostaticsHumansLaparoscopyPolypsPolysaccharidesPostoperative ComplicationsPowdersTissue AdhesionsTreatment OutcomeUterine DiseasesUterine HemorrhageUterine PerforationHemostaticsPolysaccharidesPowdersAdhesionsCase reportHemostaticsPolysaccharideUterine perforation

Identifiers

PMID27599567
PMCPMC5011909
OpenAlexW2513241105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.