ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Identification of key player genes in gene regulatory networks.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks for Breast Cancer Based on Genetic Modules.BME frontiers · 2025Article
- BootCellNet, a resampling-based procedure, promotes unsupervised identification of cell populations via robust inference of gene regulatory networks.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying the Immunotherapeutic Potential of Gene-miRNA and Drugs in Head and Neck Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cell Sources for Retinal Regeneration: Implication for Data Translation in Biomedicine of the Eye.Cells · 2022Review
- Network approaches for modeling the effect of drugs and diseases.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Article
- N(6)-methyladenosine methylation-regulated polo-like kinase 1 cell cycle homeostasis as a potential target of radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Identification of Biomarkers Controlling Cell Fate In Blood Cell Development.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Changes During Human RPE EMT in a Stem Cell Model of Epiretinal Membrane Pathogenesis and Prevention by Nicotinamide.Stem cell reports · 2020Article
- pSTAT3 Y705 is a prognostic biomarker identified from time-series gene expression profiles of a chemically induced mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- TopControl: A Tool to Prioritize Candidate Disease-associated Genes based on Topological Network Features.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Topology Consistency of Disease-specific Differential Co-regulatory Networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Article
- A workflow for the integrative transcriptomic description of molecular pathology and the suggestion of normalizing compounds, exemplified by Parkinson's disease.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Randomization Strategies Affect Motif Significance Analysis in TF-miRNA-Gene Regulatory Networks.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying the gene regulatory networks governing the workings and identity of cells is one of the main challenges in understanding processes such as cellular differentiation, reprogramming or cancerogenesis. One particular challenge is to identify the main drivers and master regulatory genes that control such cell fate transitions. In this work, we reformulate this problem as the optimization problems of computing a Minimum Dominating Set and a Minimum Connected Dominating Set for directed graphs.
resultsBoth MDS and MCDS are applied to the well-studied gene regulatory networks of the model organisms E. coli and S. cerevisiae and to a pluripotency network for mouse embryonic stem cells. The results show that MCDS can capture most of the known key player genes identified so far in the model organisms. Moreover, this method suggests an additional small set of transcription factors as novel key players for governing the cell-specific gene regulatory network which can also be investigated with regard to diseases. To this aim, we investigated the ability of MCDS to define key drivers in breast cancer. The method identified many known drug targets as members of the MDS and MCDS.
conclusionsThis paper proposes a new method to identify key player genes in gene regulatory networks. The Java implementation of the heuristic algorithm explained in this paper is available as a Cytoscape plugin at http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/mcds . The SageMath programs for solving integer linear programming formulations used in the paper are available at https://github.com/maryamNazarieh/KeyRegulatoryGenes and as supplementary material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.