Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27599332›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2016

Primary Care Screening and Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Leila C Kahwati, Cynthia Feltner, Michael Halpern, Carol L Woodell, Erin Boland, Halle R Amick, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Daniel E Jonas

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effectiveness of interventions for reducing TB incidence in countries with low TB incidence: a systematic review of reviews.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for latent tuberculosis among migrants in the EU/EEA: a systematic review.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for active tuberculosis among migrants in the EU/EEA: a systematic review.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Expert perspectives on tuberculosis screening procedures for migrants.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis in patients with solid tumors and systemic cancer therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  19. MedComm · 2024
    Review
  20. Evaluation of cytokine profiles related toFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leila C KahwatiRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Cynthia FeltnerRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center3Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill4Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Michael HalpernRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Carol L WoodellRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Erin BolandRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Halle R AmickRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center4Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Rachel Palmieri WeberRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center4Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Daniel E JonasRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center3Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill4Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
RTI International · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceFive to ten percent of individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) progress to active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Identifying and treating LTBI is a key component of the strategy for reducing the burden of TB disease.

objectiveTo review the evidence about targeted screening and treatment for LTBI among adults in primary care settings to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 1996 recommendation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and trial registries, searched through August 3, 2015; references from pertinent articles; and experts. Literature surveillance was conducted through May 31, 2016. STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies of LTBI screening, LTBI treatment with recommended pharmacotherapy, or accuracy of the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). Studies of individuals for whom LTBI screening and treatment is part of public health surveillance or disease management were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles. When at least 3 similar studies were available, random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, reliability, active TB disease, mortality, hepatotoxicity, and other harms.

resultsThe review included 72 studies (n = 51 711). No studies evaluated benefits and harms of screening compared with no screening. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of the TST at both 5-mm and 10-mm induration thresholds were 0.79 (5-mm: 95% CI, 0.69-0.89 [8 studies, n = 803]; 10 mm: 95% CI, 0.71-0.87 [11 studies; n = 988]), and those for IGRAs ranged from 0.77 to 0.90 (57 studies; n = 4378). Pooled estimates for specificity of the TST at the 10-mm and 15-mm thresholds and for IGRAs ranged from 0.95 to 0.99 (34 studies; n = 23 853). A randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 24 weeks of isoniazid in individuals with pulmonary fibrotic lesions and LTBI (n = 27 830) found a reduction in absolute risk of active TB at 5 years from 1.4% to 0.5% (relative risk [RR], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.24-0.52]) and an increase in absolute risk for hepatoxicity from 0.1% to 0.5% (RR, 4.59 [95% CI, 2.03-10.39]) for 24 weeks of daily isoniazid compared with placebo. An RCT (n = 6886) found that 3 months of once-weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid was noninferior to 9 months of isoniazid alone for preventing active TB. The risk difference for hepatoxicity comparing isoniazid with rifampin ranged from 3% to 7%, with a pooled RR of 3.29 (95% CI, 1.72-6.28 [3 RCTs; n = 1327]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No studies evaluated the benefits and harms of screening compared with no screening. Both the TST and IGRAs are moderately sensitive and highly specific within countries with low TB burden. Treatment reduced the risk of active TB among the populations included in this review. Isoniazid is associated with higher rates of hepatotoxicity than placebo or rifampin.

Indexed as

AdultAntitubercular AgentsHumansInterferon-gamma Release TestsLatent TuberculosisMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculin TestAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID27599332
OpenAlexW2513939620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.