ArticleFuture microbiology2016
Direct detection of Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens using a high-throughput multiple genetic detection system.
Article in Future microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Diagnostic Modalities forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A rapid and high-throughput multiplex genetic detection assay for detection, semi-quantification and virulence genotyping ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Generation and identification of a thyroid cancer cell line with stable expression of CCDC67 and luciferase reporter genes.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- DifferentialPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimWe evaluated the direct high-throughput multiple genetic detection system (dHMGS) for Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsies. MATERIALS &
methodsOne hundred and thirty-three specimens were concurrently analyzed by dHMGS, rapid urease test, culture and sequencing.
resultsdHMGS was highly sensitive and specific for H. pylori identification compared with culture and rapid urease test. The correlation coefficient of the quantitative standard curve was R
conclusionThe dHMGS could efficiently diagnose and quantify H. pylori burden in biopsies, simultaneously screening for virulence, antibiotic resistance and presence of the multistrain infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.