Observational studyThe Lancet. Oncology2016
30-day mortality after systemic anticancer treatment for breast and lung cancer in England: a population-based, observational study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality indicators for systemic anticancer therapy services: a systematic review of metrics used to compare quality across healthcare facilities.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic evaluation in patients with advanced cancer in the last months of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.ESMO open · 2023Guideline
- Human immunodeficiency virus infection and mortality risk among lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Search for prognostic markers of mortality in inpatients receiving palliative chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Observational
- Protocol for the development and validation of a risk score to predict risk of adverse events associated with systemic anti-cancer treatment in late-stage lung cancer: Lung Cancer Improved Decisions (LUCID).Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Review
- Early Mortality Following Systemic Anticancer Therapy in Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Spatiotemporal Multilevel Analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
- Assessing the Accuracy of Symptoms and Adverse Events Reporting for Lung Cancer Treatment in the Danish National Patient Registry.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- 'Is it my last Christmas?' Using real-world data as a prompt to reflect on goal-concordant advanced lung cancer care-a retrospective, longitudinal study.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Research trends of global artificial intelligence application in obstetrics and gynecology from 1999 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis based on web of science.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Evaluation of 30-day mortality rate following intravenous systemic anticancer therapy: a retrospective analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Effects of Home-Based Rehabilitation for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Quality Indicators for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Queensland, Australia, 2012-2021.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- NELBI score: a new clinical calculator of thirty-day mortality following systemic anticancer therapy in breast cancer patients near the end of life.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Drug Delivery Systems for Natural Medicines in Cancer Therapy.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Climate change and cancer care: impacts and implications for patients and healthcare professionals.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- Outcomes of patients receiving urgent palliative radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer: an observational study.BMC palliative care · 2024Observational
- Engineered CD4 T cells for in vivo delivery of therapeutic proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Impact of patient demographics on treatment outcomes in AML: a population-based registry in England, 2013-2020.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Optimising oncology drug expenditure in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Review
- Transfers and anesthesia-related postoperative outcomes after 3361 same-day cancer surgeries at a freestanding surgery center: An observational retrospective study.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024Observational
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background30-day mortality might be a useful indicator of avoidable harm to patients from systemic anticancer treatments, but data for this indicator are limited. The Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) dataset collated by Public Health England allows the assessment of factors affecting 30-day mortality in a national patient population. The aim of this first study based on the SACT dataset was to establish national 30-day mortality benchmarks for breast and lung cancer patients receiving SACT in England, and to start to identify where patient care could be improved.
methodsIn this population-based study, we included all women with breast cancer and all men and women with lung cancer residing in England, who were 24 years or older and who started a cycle of SACT in 2014 irrespective of the number of previous treatment cycles or programmes, and irrespective of their position within the disease trajectory. We calculated 30-day mortality after the most recent cycle of SACT for those patients. We did logistic regression analyses, adjusting for relevant factors, to examine whether patient, tumour, or treatment-related factors were associated with the risk of 30-day mortality. For each cancer type and intent, we calculated 30-day mortality rates and patient volume at the hospital trust level, and contrasted these in a funnel plot.
findingsBetween Jan 1, and Dec, 31, 2014, we included 23 228 patients with breast cancer and 9634 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in our regression and trust-level analyses. 30-day mortality increased with age for both patients with breast cancer and patients with NSCLC treated with curative intent, and decreased with age for patients receiving palliative SACT (breast curative: odds ratio [OR] 1·085, 99% CI 1·040-1·132; p<0·0001; NSCLC curative: 1·045, 1·013-1·079; p=0·00033; breast palliative: 0·987, 0·977-0·996; p=0·00034; NSCLC palliative: 0·987, 0·976-0·998; p=0·0015). 30-day mortality was also significantly higher for patients receiving their first reported curative or palliative SACT versus those who received SACT previously (breast palliative: OR 2·326 99% CI 1·634-3·312; p<0·0001; NSCLC curative: 3·371, 1·554-7·316; p<0·0001; NSCLC palliative: 2·667, 2·109-3·373; p<0·0001), and for patients with worse general wellbeing (performance status 2-4) versus those who were generally well (breast curative: 6·057, 1·333-27·513; p=0·0021; breast palliative: 6·241, 4·180-9·319; p<0·0001; NSCLC palliative: 3·384, 2·276-5·032; p<0·0001). We identified trusts with mortality rates in excess of the 95% control limits; this included seven for curative breast cancer, four for palliative breast cancer, five for curative NSCLC, and seven for palliative NSCLC.
interpretationOur findings show that several factors affect the risk of early mortality of breast and lung cancer patients in England and that some groups are at a substantially increased risk of 30-day mortality. The identification of hospitals with significantly higher 30-day mortality rates should promote review of clinical decision making in these hospitals. Furthermore, our results highlight the importance of collecting routine data beyond clinical trials to better understand the factors placing patients at higher risk of 30-day mortality, and ultimately improve clinical decision making. Our insights into the factors affecting risk of 30-day mortality will help treating clinicians and their patients predict the balance of harms and benefits associated with SACT.
fundingPublic Health England.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.