Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27598855›Full record

Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2017

Efficacy and Safety of Epratuzumab in Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From Two Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Megan E B Clowse, Daniel J Wallace, Richard A Furie, Michelle A Petri, Marilyn C Pike, Piotr Leszczyński, C Michael Neuwelt, Kathryn Hobbs, Mauro Keiserman, Liliana Duca and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. CD22 as a Target for Hematological Malignancies and Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Megan E B ClowseDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel J WallaceCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Richard A FurieNorthwell Health, New York, New York.
Michelle A PetriJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marilyn C PikeMedPharm Consulting, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Piotr LeszczyńskiPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
C Michael NeuweltAlameda County Health System, Oakland, California.
Kathryn HobbsDenver Arthritis Clinic, Denver, Colorado.
Mauro KeisermanPontifical Catholic University, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Liliana DucaClinica Neomed, Brasov, Romania.
Kenneth C KalunianUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla.
Catrinel GalateanuUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Sabine BongardtUCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany.
Christian StachUCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany.
Carolyn BeaudotUCB Pharma, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Brian KilgallenUCB Pharma, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Caroline GordonUniversity of Birmingham and University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
EMBODY Investigator Group
UCB Pharma (Germany) · DEUCB Pharma (United States) · USApple (Israel) · ILCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDenver Arthritis Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNorthwell Health · USPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpratuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CD22, modulates B cell signaling without substantial reductions in the number of B cells. The aim of this study was to report the results of 2 phase III multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, the EMBODY 1 and EMBODY 2 trials, assessing the efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in patients with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

methodsPatients met ≥4 of the American College of Rheumatology revised classification criteria for SLE, were positive for antinuclear antibodies and/or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, had an SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of ≥6 (increased disease activity), had British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 index (BILAG-2004) scores of grade A (severe disease activity) in ≥1 body system or grade B (moderate disease activity) in ≥2 body systems (in the mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, or cardiorespiratory domains), and were receiving standard therapy, including mandatory treatment with corticosteroids (5-60 mg/day). BILAG-2004 grade A scores in the renal and central nervous system domains were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either placebo, epratuzumab 600 mg every week, or epratuzumab 1,200 mg every other week, with infusions delivered for the first 4 weeks of each 12-week dosing cycle, for 4 cycles. Patients across all 3 treatment groups also continued with their standard therapy. The primary end point was the response rate at week 48 according to the BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) definition, requiring improvement in the BILAG-2004 score, no worsening in the BILAG-2004 score, SLEDAI-2K score, or physician's global assessment of disease activity, and no disallowed changes in concomitant medications. Patients who discontinued the study medication were classified as nonresponders.

resultsIn the EMBODY 1 and EMBODY 2 trials of epratuzumab, 793 patients and 791 patients, respectively, were randomized, 786 (99.1%) and 788 (99.6%), respectively, received study medication, and 528 (66.6%) and 533 (67.4%), respectively, completed the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point between the groups, with the week 48 BICLA response rates being similar between the epratuzumab groups and the placebo group (response rates ranging from 33.5% to 39.8%). No new safety signals were identified.

conclusionIn patients with moderate or severely active SLE, treatment with epratuzumab + standard therapy did not result in improvements in response rates over that observed in the placebo + standard therapy group.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedepratuzumab

Identifiers

PMID27598855
PMCPMC5299488
OpenAlexW2600952481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.