Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27598802›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Timing of Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Long-Term Results From International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VI and VII.

Per Karlsson, Bernard F Cole, Karen N Price, Richard D Gelber, Alan S Coates, Aron Goldhirsch, Monica Castiglione, Marco Colleoni, Günther Gruber, International Breast Cancer Study Group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Sequencing chemotherapy before radiotherapy for women with stage IIIC endometrial cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Saving the Breast Saves the Lives of Breast Cancer Patients.International journal of surgical oncology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How to mathematically optimize drug regimens using optimal control.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Per KarlssonDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: per.karlsson@oncology.gu.se.
Bernard F ColeDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Karen N PriceInternational Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard D GelberInternational Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Harvard T. F. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alan S CoatesInternational Breast Cancer Study Group and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Aron GoldhirschSenior Consultant Breast Cancer, European Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Milan, Italy.
Monica CastiglioneInternational Breast Cancer Study Group, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco ColleoniDivision of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Milan, Italy.
Günther GruberInstitute of Radiotherapy, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland.
International Breast Cancer Study Group
European Institute of Oncology · ITFrontier Science & Technology Research Foundation · USBreast Cancer Trials · AUInternational Breast Cancer Study Group · CHKlinik Hirslanden · CHUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

IBCSG STATISTICAL CENTER--A BREAST CANCER STUDY RESOURCEU24CA075362 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REGAN, MEREDITH M · 1997 to 2015
$7.5M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA075362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo update the previous report from 2 randomized clinical trials, now with a median follow-up of 16 years, to analyze the effect of radiation therapy timing on local failure and disease-free survival. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom July 1986 to April 1993, International Breast Cancer Study Group trial VI randomly assigned 1475 pre-/perimenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to receive 3 or 6 cycles of initial chemotherapy (CT). International Breast Cancer Study Group trial VII randomly assigned 1212 postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to receive tamoxifen for 5 years, or tamoxifen for 5 years with 3 early cycles of initial CT. For patients who received breast-conserving surgery (BCS), radiation therapy (RT) was delayed until initial CT was completed; 4 or 7 months after BCS for trial VI and 2 or 4 months for trial VII. We compared RT timing groups among 433 patients on trial VI and 285 patients on trial VII who received BCS plus RT. Endpoints were local failure, regional/distant failure, and disease-free survival (DFS).

resultsAmong pre-/perimenopausal patients there were no significant differences in disease-related outcomes. The 15-year DFS was 48.2% in the group allocated 3 months initial CT and 44.9% in the group allocated 6 months initial CT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.45). Among postmenopausal patients, the 15-year DFS was 46.1% in the no-initial-CT group and 43.3% in the group allocated 3 months initial CT (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.82-1.51). Corresponding HRs for local failures were 0.94 (95% CI 0.61-1.46) in trial VI and 1.51 (95% CI 0.77-2.97) in trial VII. For regional/distant failures, the respective HRs were 1.15 (95% CI 0.80-1.63) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.69-1.68).

conclusionsThis study confirms that, after more than 15 years of follow-up, it is reasonable to delay radiation therapy until after the completion of standard CT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionBreast NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyInternationalityLongitudinal StudiesLymphatic MetastasisMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID27598802
PMCPMC5014393
OpenAlexW2517530440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.