Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27598229›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2016

Expression of an insecticidal fern protein in cotton protects against whitefly.

Anoop Kumar Shukla, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Manisha Mishra, Sharad Saurabh, Rahul Singh, Harpal Singh, Nidhi Thakur, Preeti Rai, Paras Pandey, Aradhana L Hans and 18 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cross-kingdom convergence provides promising proteins for pest control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Novel insecticidal proteins from ferns resemble insecticidal proteins fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Bio-protocol · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anoop Kumar ShuklaGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Santosh Kumar UpadhyayGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Manisha MishraGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Sharad SaurabhGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Rahul SinghGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Harpal SinghGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Nidhi ThakurGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Preeti RaiGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Paras PandeyGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Aradhana L HansGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Subhi SrivastavaGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Vikram RajapureGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Sunil Kumar YadavGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Mithlesh Kumar SinghGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Jitendra KumarNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, Punjab, India.
K ChandrashekarGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4937-8787
Praveen C VermaGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Ajit Pratap SinghAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, New Delhi, India.
K N NairAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, New Delhi, India.
Smrati BhadauriaToxicology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Muhammad WahajuddinPharmacokinetics and Metabolism Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Sarika SinghToxicology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Sharad SharmaToxicology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
OmkarLadybird Beetle Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India.
Ram Sanmukh UpadhyayDepartment of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Shirish A RanadeGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Rakesh TuliGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Pradhyumna Kumar SinghGenetics and Plant Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
National Botanical Research Institute · INCentral Drug Research Institute · INBanaras Hindu University · INNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · INUniversity of Lucknow · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) damages field crops by sucking sap and transmitting viral diseases. None of the insecticidal proteins used in genetically modified (GM) crop plants to date are effective against whitefly. We report the identification of a protein (Tma12) from an edible fern, Tectaria macrodonta (Fee) C. Chr., that is insecticidal to whitefly (median lethal concentration = 1.49 μg/ml in in vitro feeding assays) and interferes with its life cycle at sublethal doses. Transgenic cotton lines that express Tma12 at ∼0.01% of total soluble leaf protein were resistant to whitefly infestation in contained field trials, with no detectable yield penalty. The transgenic cotton lines were also protected from whitefly-borne cotton leaf curl viral disease. Rats fed Tma12 showed no detectable histological or biochemical changes, and this, together with the predicted absence of allergenic domains in Tma12, indicates that Tma12 might be well suited for deployment in GM crops to control whitefly and the viruses it carries.

Indexed as

AnimalsFernsGenetic EnhancementGossypiumHemipteraInsecticidesPlant ProteinsProtein EngineeringRecombinant ProteinsInsecticidesPlant ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27598229
OpenAlexW2518525179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.