Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27598110›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Evaluation of the Enantiomer Specific Biokinetics and Radiation Doses of [(18)F]Fluspidine-A New Tracer in Clinical Translation for Imaging of σ₁ Receptors.

Mathias Kranz, Bernhard Sattler, Nathanael Wüst, Winnie Deuther-Conrad, Marianne Patt, Philipp M Meyer, Steffen Fischer, Cornelius K Donat, Bernhard Wünsch, Swen Hesse and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CXCR4-targeted PET imaging of glioblastoma using [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RSC medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Preclinical Incorporation Dosimetry of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Synthesis, radiolabelling, and evaluation of [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  17. Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mathias KranzHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Neuroradiopharmaceuticals, Leipzig 04318, Germany. m.kranz@hzdr.de.
Bernhard SattlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany. Bernhard.Sattler@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Nathanael WüstDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany. Nathanael.Wuest@gmx.de.
Winnie Deuther-ConradHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Neuroradiopharmaceuticals, Leipzig 04318, Germany. w.deuther-conrad@hzdr.de.
Marianne PattDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany. Marianne.Patt@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Philipp M MeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany. Philipp.Meyer@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Steffen FischerHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Neuroradiopharmaceuticals, Leipzig 04318, Germany. s.fischer@hzdr.de.
Cornelius K DonatHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Neuroradiopharmaceuticals, Leipzig 04318, Germany. c.donat@imperial.ac.uk.
Bernhard WünschPharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University Münster, Münster 48149, Germany. wuensch@uni-muenster.de.
Swen HesseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany. Swen.Hesse@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Jörg SteinbachHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Neuroradiopharmaceuticals, Leipzig 04318, Germany. j.steinbach@hzdr.de.
Peter BrustHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Neuroradiopharmaceuticals, Leipzig 04318, Germany. p.brust@hzdr.de.
Osama SabriDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany. Osama.Sabri@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enantiomers of [(18)F]fluspidine, recently developed for imaging of σ₁ receptors, possess distinct pharmacokinetics facilitating their use in different clinical settings. To support their translational potential, we estimated the human radiation dose of (S)-(-)-[(18)F]fluspidine and (R)-(+)-[(18)F]fluspidine from ex vivo biodistribution and PET/MRI data in mice after extrapolation to the human scale. In addition, we validated the preclinical results by performing a first-in-human PET/CT study using (S)-(-)-[(18)F]fluspidine. Based on the respective time-activity curves, we calculated using OLINDA the particular organ doses (ODs) and effective doses (EDs). The ED values of (S)-(-)-[(18)F]fluspidine and (R)-(+)-[(18)F]fluspidine differed significantly with image-derived values obtained in mice with 12.9 μSv/MBq and 14.0 μSv/MBq (p < 0.025), respectively. A comparable ratio was estimated from the biodistribution data. In the human study, the ED of (S)-(-)-[(18)F]fluspidine was calculated as 21.0 μSv/MBq. Altogether, the ED values for both [(18)F]fluspidine enantiomers determined from the preclinical studies are comparable with other (18)F-labeled PET imaging agents. In addition, the first-in-human study confirmed that the radiation risk of (S)-(-)-[(18)F]fluspidine imaging is within acceptable limits. However, as already shown for other PET tracers, the actual ED of (S)-(-)-[(18)F]fluspidine in humans was underestimated by preclinical imaging which needs to be considered in other first-in-human studies.

Indexed as

BenzofuransFluorine RadioisotopesPiperidinesRadiation DosageRadiopharmaceuticalsAnimalsHumansMaleMicePositron-Emission TomographyRadioactive Tracers1'-benzyl-3-(2-fluoroethyl)-3H-spiro((2)benzofuran-1,4'-piperidine)BenzofuransFluorine RadioisotopesPiperidinesRadioactive TracersRadiopharmaceuticals[18F]fluspidineimage based internal dosimetrypreclinical hybrid PET/MRIradiation safetyσ1 receptors

Identifiers

PMID27598110
PMCPMC6273209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.