Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27597991›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Acute, Recent and Past HEV Infection among Voluntary Blood Donors in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Meiyu Wang, Ping Fu, Yonghua Yin, Miao He, Yu Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Consensus on prevention and treatment of hepatitis E].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  10. Transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E: What we know so far?World journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hepatitis E virus and blood transfusion safety.Epidemiology and infection · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meiyu WangInstitute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, HuaCai Road 26 Hao, Dong San Huan Road ErDuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ping FuInstitute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, HuaCai Road 26 Hao, Dong San Huan Road ErDuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yonghua YinInstitute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, HuaCai Road 26 Hao, Dong San Huan Road ErDuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Miao HeInstitute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, HuaCai Road 26 Hao, Dong San Huan Road ErDuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yu LiuInstitute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, HuaCai Road 26 Hao, Dong San Huan Road ErDuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHepatitis E virus is one of new threats to blood safety which was usually considered to be transmitted via fecal-oral route. China is one of the hyperendemic regions where frequent outbreaks of hepatitis E are noted. However, the overall prevalence of HEV infection among mainland Chinese blood donors is not clear until now.

methodThe peer-reviewed literatures reporting the prevalence of HEV in Chinese blood donors were identified by systematic searching of five electronic databases. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement issued in 2009. Data manipulation and statistical analyses were performed by Stata 12.0.

resultsFourteen eligible articles involving 22 independent studies were included. Pooled prevalence of HEV infection biomarkers (anti-HEV IgG, anti-HEV IgM, RNA and antigen) among mainland Chinese blood donors were 29.2%, 1.1%, 0.1% and 0.1%, respectively which were higher than the data reported in other countries. The analysis of HEV genotypes indicated that the most prevalent strains in Chinese blood donors were genotype 1 and 4.

conclusionsMainland China is indicated with a relatively higher risk of transmission of hepatitis E through transfusion and the screening of blood donors for HEV RNA, especially in HEV-endemic areas, might reduce the potential risk of HEV infection via transfusion.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsBiomarkersBlood SafetyChinaHepatitis AntibodiesHepatitis EHepatitis E virusHumansBiomarkersHepatitis Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID27597991
PMCPMC5012590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.