Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27597863›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2016

Recognition Accuracy Using 3D Endoscopic Images for Superficial Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Crossover Study.

Kosuke Nomura, Mitsuru Kaise, Daisuke Kikuchi, Toshiro Iizuka, Yumiko Fukuma, Yasutaka Kuribayashi, Masami Tanaka, Takahito Toba, Tsukasa Furuhata, Satoshi Yamashita and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kosuke NomuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-9795
Mitsuru KaiseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Daisuke KikuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Toshiro IizukaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Yumiko FukumaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Yasutaka KuribayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Masami TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Takahito TobaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Tsukasa FuruhataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Satoshi YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Akira MatsuiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Toshifumi MitaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.
Shu HoteyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim. To determine whether 3D endoscopic images improved recognition accuracy for superficial gastrointestinal cancer compared with 2D images. Methods. We created an image catalog using 2D and 3D images of 20 specimens resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The twelve participants were allocated into two groups. Group 1 evaluated only 2D images at first, group 2 evaluated 3D images, and, after an interval of 2 weeks, group 1 next evaluated 3D and group 2 evaluated 2D images. The evaluation items were as follows: (1) diagnostic accuracy of the tumor extent and (2) confidence levels in assessing (a) tumor extent, (b) morphology, (c) microsurface structure, and (d) comprehensive recognition. Results. The use of 3D images resulted in an improvement in diagnostic accuracy in both group 1 (2D: 76.9%, 3D: 78.6%) and group 2 (2D: 79.9%, 3D: 83.6%), with no statistically significant difference. The confidence levels were higher for all items ((a) to (d)) when 3D images were used. With respect to experience, the degree of the improvement showed the following trend: novices > trainees > experts. Conclusions. By conversion into 3D images, there was a significant improvement in the diagnostic confidence level for superficial tumors, and the improvement was greater in individuals with lower endoscopic expertise.

Identifiers

PMID27597863
PMCPMC5002472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.